Suppr超能文献

托莫西汀治疗合并对立违抗性障碍的儿童注意缺陷多动障碍的疗效与安全性

Efficacy and safety of atomoxetine in childhood attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder with comorbid oppositional defiant disorder.

作者信息

Kaplan S, Heiligenstein J, West S, Busner J, Harder D, Dittmann R, Casat C, Wernicke J F

机构信息

Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Department of Psychiatry, Hershey, PA 17033, USA.

出版信息

J Atten Disord. 2004 Oct;8(2):45-52. doi: 10.1177/108705470400800202.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the safety and efficacy of atomoxetine, a selective inhibitor of the norepinephrine transporter, versus placebo in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) patients with comorbid Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD).

METHODS

A subset analysis of 98 children from two identical, multi-site, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials involving 9 weeks of treatment with atomoxetine or placebo was conducted. Patients met DSM-IV ADHD criteria. ODD was diagnosed with the Diagnostic Interview for Children and Adolescents-IV (DICA-IV; Reich, Weiner, and Herjanic, 1997). ADHD severity was assessed with the ADHD Rating Scale-IV-Parent Version: Investigator Administered and Scored (ADHD-RS-IV-Parent:lnv; DuPaul, Power, Anastopoulos, and Reid, 1998); the short version of the Conners' Parent Rating Scales-Revised (CPRS-R:S; Conners, 2000); and the Clinical Global Impressions of ADHD Severity (CGI-ADHD-S; Guy, 1976). Clinical response was defined as a > or = 25% reduction in ADHD-RS-IV-Parent:lnv total score.

RESULTS

ADHD-RS-IV-Parent:lnv, CGI-ADHD-S, and three CPRS-R:S subscale scores improved markedly with atomoxetine treatment. However, a decrease in the CPRS-R:S Oppositional subscore for atomoxetine-treated patients was not significantly greater than scores for placebo-treated patients. Clinical response rates were 65.4% in the atomoxetine group, and 36.4% in the placebo group (p = .007).

CONCLUSION

Atomoxetine was effective for the treatment of ADHD in patients with comorbid ODD. It did not significantly reduce the severity of ODD symptoms, and was well tolerated by the patients.

摘要

目的

比较去甲肾上腺素转运体选择性抑制剂托莫西汀与安慰剂在患有对立违抗性障碍(ODD)的注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)患者中的安全性和有效性。

方法

对来自两项相同的多中心、双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验的98名儿童进行亚组分析,这两项试验涉及用托莫西汀或安慰剂治疗9周。患者符合《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)ADHD标准。使用《儿童及青少年诊断访谈量表》第四版(DICA-IV;Reich、Weiner和Herjanic,1997年)诊断ODD。使用《ADHD评定量表》第四版家长版:研究者施测与评分(ADHD-RS-IV-Parent:Inv;DuPaul、Power、Anastopoulos和Reid,1998年)、《康纳斯父母评定量表修订版》简版(CPRS-R:S;Conners,2000年)以及ADHD严重程度的临床总体印象量表(CGI-ADHD-S;Guy,1976年)评估ADHD严重程度。临床反应定义为ADHD-RS-IV-Parent:Inv总分降低≥25%。

结果

托莫西汀治疗后,ADHD-RS-IV-Parent:Inv、CGI-ADHD-S以及CPRS-R:S三个子量表得分均有显著改善。然而,托莫西汀治疗患者的CPRS-R:S对立性子量表得分下降幅度并不显著大于安慰剂治疗患者的得分。托莫西汀组的临床反应率为65.4%,安慰剂组为36.4%(p = 0.007)。

结论

托莫西汀对患有共病ODD的ADHD患者有效。它并未显著降低ODD症状的严重程度,且患者耐受性良好。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验