Sakamoto Masanori, Endoh Takashi, Nakajima Tsuyoshi, Tazoe Toshiki, Shiozawa Shinichiro, Komiyama Tomoyoshi
Division of Health and Sport Education, United of Graduate School of Education, Tokyo Gakugei University, 1-33 Yayoi-cho, Inage-Ku, Chiba City 263-8522, Japan.
Clin Neurophysiol. 2006 Jun;117(6):1301-11. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2006.03.005. Epub 2006 May 2.
We investigated to what extent intralimb and interlimb cutaneous reflexes are altered while simultaneously performing arm and leg cycling (AL cycling) under different kinematic and postural conditions.
Eleven subjects performed AL cycling under conditions in which the arm and leg crank ipsilateral to the stimulation side were moved synchronously (in-phase cycling) or asynchronously (anti-phase cycling) while sitting or standing. Cutaneous reflexes following superficial radial or superficial peroneal nerve stimulation (2.0-2.5 times radiating threshold, 5 pulses at 333 Hz) were recorded at 4 different pedal positions from 12 muscles in the upper and lower limbs. Cutaneous reflexes with a peak latency of 80-120 ms were then analyzed.
The magnitude of interlimb and intralimb cutaneous reflexes in the arm and leg muscles was significantly modulated depending on the crank position for the relevant limb (phase-dependent modulation). A significant correlation between the magnitude of the cutaneous reflex and background EMG was observed in the majority of muscles during static contraction, but not during AL cycling (task-dependent modulation). No significant difference was found in comparisons of the magnitude of intralimb and interlimb cutaneous reflexes obtained during in- and anti-phase AL cycling. Qualitatively, the same results were obtained during AL cycling while sitting or standing. In addition, the modulation of cutaneous reflexes in arm muscles was identical among in-phase, anti-phase and isolated arm cycling. Results were the same for leg muscles.
Cutaneous reflexes in arm muscles are little influenced by rhythmic movement of the legs and vice versa during AL cycling. It is likely that neural components that control interlimb reflexes are loosely coupled during AL cycling while sitting or standing.
Our results provide a better understanding of the coordination between the upper and lower limbs during rhythmic movement.
我们研究了在不同运动学和姿势条件下同时进行手臂和腿部骑行(AL骑行)时,肢体内部和肢体间皮肤反射在多大程度上发生改变。
11名受试者在坐着或站立的情况下,在刺激侧同侧的手臂和腿部曲柄同步(同相骑行)或异步(反相骑行)移动的条件下进行AL骑行。在上下肢的12块肌肉中,于4个不同的踏板位置记录桡浅神经或腓浅神经刺激(2.0 - 2.5倍放射阈值,333 Hz下5个脉冲)后的皮肤反射。然后分析峰值潜伏期为80 - 120 ms的皮肤反射。
手臂和腿部肌肉中肢体间和肢体内部皮肤反射的幅度根据相关肢体的曲柄位置有显著调节(相位依赖性调节)。在静态收缩期间,大多数肌肉中观察到皮肤反射幅度与背景肌电图之间存在显著相关性,但在AL骑行期间未观察到(任务依赖性调节)。在同相和反相AL骑行期间获得的肢体内部和肢体间皮肤反射幅度比较中未发现显著差异。定性地说,坐着或站立进行AL骑行时获得了相同的结果。此外,同相、反相和单独手臂骑行期间手臂肌肉中皮肤反射的调节是相同的。腿部肌肉的结果相同。
在AL骑行期间,手臂肌肉中的皮肤反射受腿部节律性运动的影响很小,反之亦然。在坐着或站立进行AL骑行时,控制肢体间反射的神经成分可能松散耦合。
我们的结果有助于更好地理解有节奏运动期间上肢和下肢之间的协调。