Zehr E Paul, Balter Jaclyn E, Ferris Daniel P, Hundza Sandra R, Loadman Pamela M, Stoloff Rebecca H
Rehabilitation Neuroscience Laboratory, PO Box 3010 STN CSC, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada V8W 3P1.
J Physiol. 2007 Jul 1;582(Pt 1):209-27. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.133843. Epub 2007 Apr 26.
It has been proposed that different forms of rhythmic human limb movement have a common central neural control ('common core hypothesis'), just as in other animals. We compared the modulation patterns of background EMG and cutaneous reflexes during walking, arm and leg cycling, and arm-assisted recumbent stepping. We hypothesized that patterns of EMG and reflex modulation during cycling and stepping (deduced from mathematical principal components analysis) would be comparable to those during walking because they rely on similar neural substrates. Differences between the tasks were assessed by evoking cutaneous reflexes via stimulation of nerves in the foot and hand in separate trials. The EMG was recorded from flexor and extensor muscles of the arms and legs. Angular positions of the hip, knee and elbow joints were also recorded. Factor analysis revealed that across the three tasks, four principal components explained more than 93% of the variance in the background EMG and middle-latency reflex amplitude. Phase modulation of reflex amplitude was observed in most muscles across all tasks, suggesting activity in similar control networks. Significant correlations between EMG level and reflex amplitude were frequently observed only during static voluntary muscle activation and not during rhythmic movement. Results from a control experiment showed that strong correlation between EMG and reflex amplitudes was observed during discrete, voluntary leg extension but not during walking. There were task-dependent differences in reflex modulation between the three tasks which probably arise owing to specific constraints during each task. Overall, the results show strong correlation across tasks and support common neural patterning as the regulator of arm and leg movement during various rhythmic human movements.
有人提出,与其他动物一样,人类不同形式的有节奏肢体运动具有共同的中枢神经控制(“共同核心假说”)。我们比较了步行、手臂和腿部骑行以及手臂辅助卧位踏步过程中背景肌电图(EMG)和皮肤反射的调制模式。我们假设,骑行和踏步过程中EMG和反射调制模式(由数学主成分分析推导得出)将与步行过程中的模式相当,因为它们依赖于相似的神经基质。在单独的试验中,通过刺激足部和手部的神经诱发皮肤反射,评估任务之间的差异。记录手臂和腿部屈肌和伸肌的EMG。还记录了髋、膝和肘关节的角位置。因子分析表明,在这三项任务中,四个主成分解释了背景EMG和中潜伏期反射幅度方差的93%以上。在所有任务的大多数肌肉中都观察到反射幅度的相位调制,表明在相似的控制网络中有活动。仅在静态自主肌肉激活期间而非有节奏运动期间,经常观察到EMG水平与反射幅度之间存在显著相关性。对照实验结果表明,在离散的自主腿部伸展过程中观察到EMG与反射幅度之间存在强相关性,但在步行过程中未观察到。这三项任务之间在反射调制方面存在任务依赖性差异,这可能是由于每项任务中的特定限制所致。总体而言,结果表明不同任务之间存在强相关性,并支持共同神经模式作为人类各种有节奏运动中手臂和腿部运动的调节机制。