Hill Philip C, Brookes Roger H, Adetifa Ifedayo M O, Fox Annette, Jackson-Sillah Dolly, Lugos Moses D, Donkor Simon A, Marshall Roger J, Howie Stephen R C, Corrah Tumani, Jeffries David J, Adegbola Richard A, McAdam Keith P W J
Tuberculosis Division, Mulago Hospital Complex, Kampala, Uganda.
Pediatrics. 2006 May;117(5):1542-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-2095.
To compare the enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) assay with the tuberculin skin test (TST) in children for the diagnosis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in the Gambia.
We divided child contacts of sputum smear-positive tuberculosis cases into 3 age categories (<5, 5-9, and 10-14 years) and assessed agreement between the 2 tests plus their relationship to prior Bacille Calmette-Guerin (BCG) vaccination. We categorized a child's level of M tuberculosis exposure according to where he/she slept relative to a case: the same room, same house, or a different house. The relationship between exposure and test result was assessed by multiple logistic regression.
In child contacts of 287 cases, 225 (32.5%) of 693 were positive by TST and 232 (32.3%) of 718 by ELISPOT. The overall agreement between tests was 83% and the discordance was not significant. Both tests responded to the M tuberculosis exposure gradient in each age category. The percentage of those who were TST positive/ELISPOT negative increased with increasing exposure. At the lowest exposure level, the percentage of ELISPOT-positive children who were TST negative was increased compared with the highest exposure level. Neither test had evidence of false positive results because of BCG.
In Gambian children, the ELISPOT is slightly less sensitive than the TST in the diagnosis of M tuberculosis infection from recent exposure, and neither test is confounded by prior BCG vaccination. Evidence of reduced TST sensitivity in subjects with the lowest known recent M tuberculosis exposure suggests that, when maximal sensitivity is important, the 2 tests may be best used together.
在冈比亚儿童中比较酶联免疫斑点(ELISPOT)检测与结核菌素皮肤试验(TST)对结核分枝杆菌感染的诊断价值。
我们将痰涂片阳性肺结核病例的儿童接触者分为3个年龄组(<5岁、5 - 9岁和10 - 14岁),评估这两种检测方法之间的一致性及其与既往卡介苗(BCG)接种的关系。根据儿童相对于病例的睡眠地点,将其结核分枝杆菌暴露水平分为:同一房间、同一房屋或不同房屋。通过多因素逻辑回归评估暴露与检测结果之间 的关系。
在287例病例的儿童接触者中,693例中有225例(32.5%)TST阳性,718例中有232例(32.3%)ELISPOT阳性。两种检测方法的总体一致性为83%,不一致性无统计学意义。两种检测方法在各年龄组中均对结核分枝杆菌暴露梯度有反应。TST阳性/ELISPOT阴性者的比例随暴露增加而升高。在最低暴露水平下,ELISPOT阳性而TST阴性的儿童比例高于最高暴露水平。两种检测方法均无因卡介苗接种导致假阳性结果的证据。
在冈比亚儿童中,ELISPOT在诊断近期暴露所致结核分枝杆菌感染方面的敏感性略低于TST,且两种检测方法均不受既往卡介苗接种的干扰。在已知近期结核分枝杆菌暴露水平最低的受试者中,TST敏感性降低的证据表明,当最大敏感性很重要时,最好同时使用这两种检测方法。