de Jesus Rivas N, Whitaker J R
Department of Food Science and Technology, University of California, Davis, California 95616.
Plant Physiol. 1973 Nov;52(5):501-7. doi: 10.1104/pp.52.5.501.
Two polyphenol oxidases (enzymes A and B) from Bartlett pear (Pyrus communis) peelings were purified to electrophoretic homogeneity according to polyacrylamide gel by a combination of Sephadex gel filtration, diethylaminoethyl cellulose chromatography and hydroxyl apatite chromatography. While the two enzymes differ electrophoretically at pH 9.3, chromatographically on hydroxyl apatite, and in the effect of ionic strength on activity, they are similar with respect to chromatography on diethylaminoethyl cellulose, substrate specificity, pH activity relations, inhibition by p-coumaric and benzoic acids, and heat stability. The two enzymes are o-diphenol oxidases with no detectable monophenolase or laccase activities. Pyrocatechol, 4-methyl catechol, chlorogenic acid, and d-catechin are good substrates of the enzymes with K(m) values in the range of 2 to 20 mm. Dependences of activity on oxygen and chlorogenic acid concentrations indicate a sequential mechanism for binding of these substrates to enzyme B. V(max) and K(m) values for oxygen and chlorogenic acid were 103 mumoles O(2) uptake per minute per milligram of enzyme, 0.11 mm and 7.2 mm, respectively, for enzyme B at pH 4.0. Both enzymes had maximum activity at pH 4.0 on chlorogenic acid. K(m) values for chlorogenic acid were independent of pH from 3 to 7; the V(max) values for both enzymes gave bell-shaped curves as a function of pH. p-Coumaric acid is a simple, linear noncompetitive inhibitor with respect to chlorogenic acid at pH 6.2 with K(i) values of 0.38 and 0.50 mm for enzymes A and B, respectively. Benzoic acid is a linear competitive inhibitor with respect to chlorogenic acid at pH 4.0 with K(i) values of 0.04 and 0.11 mm for enzymes A and B, respectively.
通过葡聚糖凝胶过滤、二乙氨基乙基纤维素色谱法和羟基磷灰石色谱法相结合的方法,将巴特利特梨(西洋梨)果皮中的两种多酚氧化酶(酶A和酶B)纯化至电泳纯。虽然这两种酶在pH 9.3时电泳不同,在羟基磷灰石上的色谱行为不同,离子强度对活性的影响也不同,但它们在二乙氨基乙基纤维素色谱、底物特异性、pH活性关系、对香豆酸和苯甲酸的抑制作用以及热稳定性方面相似。这两种酶都是邻二酚氧化酶,没有可检测到的单酚酶或漆酶活性。儿茶酚、4-甲基儿茶酚、绿原酸和d-儿茶素是这些酶的良好底物,K(m)值在2至20 mM范围内。活性对氧气和绿原酸浓度的依赖性表明这些底物与酶B结合的顺序机制。在pH 4.0时,酶B对氧气和绿原酸的V(max)和K(m)值分别为每毫克酶每分钟103微摩尔O(2)摄取量、0.11 mM和7.2 mM。两种酶在pH 4.0时对绿原酸具有最大活性。绿原酸的K(m)值在pH 3至7范围内与pH无关;两种酶的V(max)值作为pH的函数呈钟形曲线。在pH 6.2时,对香豆酸是绿原酸的简单线性非竞争性抑制剂,酶A和酶B的K(i)值分别为0.38和0.50 mM。在pH 4.0时,苯甲酸是绿原酸的线性竞争性抑制剂,酶A和酶B的K(i)值分别为0.04和0.11 mM。