• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同生长阶段遭受水分胁迫的向日葵和大豆的水势与气孔阻力

Water Potential and Stomatal Resistance of Sunflower and Soybean Subjected to Water Stress during Various Growth Stages.

作者信息

Sionit N, Kramer P J

机构信息

Department of Botany, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27706.

出版信息

Plant Physiol. 1976 Oct;58(4):537-40. doi: 10.1104/pp.58.4.537.

DOI:10.1104/pp.58.4.537
PMID:16659712
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC543270/
Abstract

Plants of two varieties of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) and two varieties of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) were grown in controlled environments and subjected to water stress at various stages of growth. Leaf resistances and leaf water potentials were measured as stress developed. In soybeans the upper leaf surface had a higher resistance than the lower surface at all leaf water potentials and growth stages. Resistance of the upper surface began to increase at a higher water potential and increased more than the resistance of the lower surface. Resistances returned to prestress values 4 days after rewatering. In sunflowers upper and lower leaf surfaces had similar resistances at all water potentials and growth stages. Leaf resistances were higher in sunflower plants stressed before flowering than in those stressed later. Sunflower plants stressed to -16 bars recovered their prestress leaf resistance and water potential a few days after rewatering, but leaves of sunflower plants stressed to -23 bars died. Leaves of soybean and sunflower plants stressed before flowering suffered less injury than those of older plants and sunflowers stressed after flowering suffered more injury than soybeans.

摘要

两种大豆品种(大豆(Glycine max (L.) Merr.))和两种向日葵品种(向日葵(Helianthus annuus L.))的植株在可控环境中生长,并在生长的不同阶段遭受水分胁迫。随着胁迫的发展,测定了叶片阻力和叶片水势。在大豆中,在所有叶片水势和生长阶段,叶片上表面的阻力都高于下表面。上表面的阻力在较高的水势下开始增加,且增加幅度大于下表面的阻力。复水4天后,阻力恢复到胁迫前的值。在向日葵中,在所有水势和生长阶段,叶片上表面和下表面的阻力相似。开花前遭受胁迫的向日葵植株的叶片阻力高于开花后遭受胁迫的植株。胁迫至-16巴的向日葵植株在复水几天后恢复了胁迫前的叶片阻力和水势,但胁迫至-23巴的向日葵植株的叶片死亡。开花前遭受胁迫的大豆和向日葵植株的叶片受到的损伤比老植株的叶片小,开花后遭受胁迫的向日葵植株的叶片比大豆植株的叶片受到的损伤更大。

相似文献

1
Water Potential and Stomatal Resistance of Sunflower and Soybean Subjected to Water Stress during Various Growth Stages.不同生长阶段遭受水分胁迫的向日葵和大豆的水势与气孔阻力
Plant Physiol. 1976 Oct;58(4):537-40. doi: 10.1104/pp.58.4.537.
2
Nodule activity and allocation of photosynthate of soybean during recovery from water stress.水分胁迫恢复过程中大豆根瘤活性及光合产物分配
Plant Physiol. 1987 May;84(1):456-60. doi: 10.1104/pp.84.2.456.
3
Leaf enlargement and metabolic rates in corn, soybean, and sunflower at various leaf water potentials.不同叶水势下玉米、大豆和向日葵的叶片扩张和代谢率。
Plant Physiol. 1970 Aug;46(2):233-5. doi: 10.1104/pp.46.2.233.
4
Chloroplast Response to Low Leaf Water Potentials: IV. Quantum Yield Is Reduced.叶绿体对低叶片水势的响应:IV. 量子产率降低。
Plant Physiol. 1976 May;57(5):704-9. doi: 10.1104/pp.57.5.704.
5
Recovery of photosynthesis in sunflower after a period of low leaf water potential.向日葵在一段时间低叶水势后光合作用的恢复。
Plant Physiol. 1971 Jun;47(6):816-20. doi: 10.1104/pp.47.6.816.
6
Behavior of Corn and Sorghum under Water Stress and during Recovery.玉米和高粱在水分胁迫及恢复过程中的表现
Plant Physiol. 1971 Nov;48(5):613-6. doi: 10.1104/pp.48.5.613.
7
Photosynthesis, dry matter accumulation and distribution in the wild sunflower Helianthus petiolaris and the cultivated sunflower Helianthus annuus as influenced by water deficits.水分亏缺对野生向日葵(糙叶向日葵)和栽培向日葵(向日葵)光合作用、干物质积累及分配的影响
Oecologia. 1986 May;69(2):181-187. doi: 10.1007/BF00377619.
8
Hydraulics and gas exchange recover more rapidly from severe drought stress in small pot-grown grapevines than in field-grown plants.与田间种植的葡萄植株相比,盆栽小葡萄藤在遭受严重干旱胁迫后,其水力和气体交换的恢复速度更快。
J Plant Physiol. 2017 Sep;216:58-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2017.05.008. Epub 2017 May 20.
9
Dinitrogen fixation in soybean in response to leaf water stress and seed growth rate.大豆中响应叶片水分胁迫和种子生长速率的固氮作用。
Crop Sci. 1985 Jan-Feb;25:52-8. doi: 10.2135/cropsci1985.0011183x002500010015x.
10
Root-derived trans-zeatin riboside and abscisic acid in drought-stressed and rewatered sunflower plants: interaction in the control of leaf diffusive resistance?干旱胁迫及复水后向日葵植株中根系来源的反式玉米素核苷和脱落酸:在叶片扩散阻力控制中的相互作用?
Funct Plant Biol. 2003 May;30(4):365-375. doi: 10.1071/FP02223.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of a system for the imposition of plant water stress.植物水分胁迫施加系统的评价。
Plant Physiol. 1985 Mar;77(3):602-7. doi: 10.1104/pp.77.3.602.
2
Influence of elevated carbon dioxide on water relations of soybeans.二氧化碳浓度升高对大豆水分关系的影响。
Plant Physiol. 1984 Feb;74(2):233-8. doi: 10.1104/pp.74.2.233.
3
An apparent anomaly in peanut leaf conductance.花生叶片导度中的一个明显异常现象。
Plant Physiol. 1980 May;65(5):848-51. doi: 10.1104/pp.65.5.848.
4
Response of leaf water potential, stomatal resistance, and leaf rolling to water stress.叶片水势、气孔阻力和叶片卷曲对水分胁迫的响应。
Plant Physiol. 1980 Mar;65(3):428-32. doi: 10.1104/pp.65.3.428.

本文引用的文献

1
Concurrent comparisons of stomatal behavior, water status, and evaporation of maize in soil at high or low water potential.在高水势或低水势土壤中玉米气孔行为、水分状况和蒸发的同步比较。
Plant Physiol. 1975 May;55(5):932-6. doi: 10.1104/pp.55.5.932.
2
Influence of soil water stress on evaporation, root absorption, and internal water status of cotton.土壤水分胁迫对棉花蒸发、根系吸收和内部水分状况的影响。
Plant Physiol. 1971 Dec;48(6):783-8. doi: 10.1104/pp.48.6.783.
3
Behavior of Corn and Sorghum under Water Stress and during Recovery.玉米和高粱在水分胁迫及恢复过程中的表现
Plant Physiol. 1971 Nov;48(5):613-6. doi: 10.1104/pp.48.5.613.
4
Recovery of photosynthesis in sunflower after a period of low leaf water potential.向日葵在一段时间低叶水势后光合作用的恢复。
Plant Physiol. 1971 Jun;47(6):816-20. doi: 10.1104/pp.47.6.816.
5
Stomatal diffusion resistance of snap beans. I. Influence of leaf-water potential.豇豆气孔扩散阻力。I. 叶水势的影响。
Plant Physiol. 1969 Nov;44(11):1547-52. doi: 10.1104/pp.44.11.1547.
6
Stomatal Diffusion Resistance of Snap Beans. II. Effect of Light.豌豆气孔扩散阻力。二、光的影响。
Plant Physiol. 1969 Nov;44(11):1542-6. doi: 10.1104/pp.44.11.1542.
7
Design calibration and field use of a stomatal diffusion porometer.气孔扩散计的设计校准与现场使用
Plant Physiol. 1969 Jun;44(6):881-5. doi: 10.1104/pp.44.6.881.
8
GROWTH AND NUTRIENT RESPONSES OF LITTLE TURKISH TOBACCO TO LONG AND SHORT PHOTOPERIODS.小土耳其烟草对长短光周期的生长及养分响应
Plant Physiol. 1945 Apr;20(2):183-99. doi: 10.1104/pp.20.2.183.
9
The identification of congenital deafness.先天性耳聋的识别
Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1970 Nov-Dec;74(6):1208-14.