MSU-ERDA Plant Research Laboratory, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824.
Plant Physiol. 1978 May;61(5):761-7. doi: 10.1104/pp.61.5.761.
The relative resistance of four cultivars of the Cucurbitaceae (Cucumis sativus L. cv. National Pickling, and inbred line SC 25; Cucurbita pepo L. cv. Prolific Straightneck Squash, and cv. Small Sugar Pumpkin) to SO(2) was determined. According to plots of the degree of exposure to SO(2) (which depends on the SO(2) concentration and the duration of the exposure), there is an 8-fold difference in resistance to this toxic gas among these cultivars. However, if the degree of injury is plotted as a function of the amount of SO(2) absorbed, all four cultivars appear similarly sensitive to the gas. We conclude that the principal reason for special and varietal differences in resistance among these cultivars is the relative rate of absorption of the gas. The densities of stomata on the upper and lower surfaces of leaves did not differ sufficiently between cultivars to account for the differences in absorption rates. It remains to be determined whether the differences in rate of SO(2) absorption reflect differences in stomatal activity.Resistance of individual leaves changes with position on the plant axis (age of the leaf). There exists a gradient of decreasing resistance from the apex downward. This resistance gradient cannot be accounted for by differences in rates of SO(2) absorption. We infer the existence of a biochemically based, developmentally controlled resistance mechanism which functions after SO(2) has entered the leaf. Biochemical comparisons of old and young leaves with such differences in resistance should be helpful in determining the biochemistry of SO(2) toxicity.
四种葫芦科(黄瓜属的 Cucumis sativus L. cv. National Pickling 和自交系 SC 25;南瓜属的 Cucurbita pepo L. cv. Prolific Straightneck Squash 和 cv. Small Sugar Pumpkin)对 SO₂相对抗性的测定。根据暴露于 SO₂的程度(取决于 SO₂浓度和暴露时间)的图谱,这些品种之间对这种有毒气体的抗性存在 8 倍的差异。然而,如果将损伤程度绘制为吸收的 SO₂量的函数,则所有四个品种对气体的敏感性似乎相似。我们得出结论,这些品种之间特殊和品种抗性差异的主要原因是气体的相对吸收速率。叶片上下表面的气孔密度在品种之间没有足够的差异,无法解释吸收速率的差异。尚需确定 SO₂吸收速率的差异是否反映了气孔活动的差异。个别叶片的抗性随植株轴上的位置(叶片年龄)而变化。从顶端向下存在抗性降低的梯度。这种抗性梯度不能用 SO₂吸收速率的差异来解释。我们推断存在一种基于生化的、发育控制的抗性机制,它在 SO₂进入叶片后起作用。对具有这种抗性差异的老叶和嫩叶进行生化比较,有助于确定 SO₂毒性的生化机制。