Edmunds L N, Tay D E, Laval-Martin D L
Department of Anatomical Sciences, School of Medicine, State University of New York, Stony Brook, New York 11794.
Plant Physiol. 1982 Jul;70(1):297-302. doi: 10.1104/pp.70.1.297.
The cell division rhythm in Euglena gracilis Klebs (Z strain) freeruns with a circadian period (30.2 +/- 1.8 hours for 156 monitored oscillations) in aerated, magnetically stirred, 8-liter, axenic batch cultures grown photoautotrophically at 25 degrees C in LD: 3,3, (7,500 lux, cool-white fluorescent) 6-hour light cycles from the moment of inoculation. Cell number was measured at 2-hour intervals with an automatic fraction collector and Coulter Electronic Particle Counter. At different circadian times throughout the 30-hour division cycle, 3-hour light perturbations were imposed on free-running cell populations by giving light during one of the intervals when dark would have fallen in the LD: 3,3 regimen. Using the onset of division as the phase reference point, the net steady-state phase advance or delay (+/-Deltaphi) of the rhythm was determined after transients, if any, had subsided (usually in one or two days) relative to an unperturbed control culture. Both +Deltaphi and -Deltaphi were found, with maximum values of approximately +/-11 to 12 hours being obtained at circadian time (CT) 20 to 22 (the ;breakpoint'); little, if any phase shift occurred if the light signal was given between CT 6 and CT 12. The phase-resetting curve obtained by plotting new phase (phi') versus old phase (phi) was of the type 0 (;strong') variety. Light perturbations, no matter when imposed, engendered new phases which mapped to a relatively restricted portion (CT 6 to CT 13) of the circadian cycle.These data provide the first detailed phase-response curve for a circadian mitotic clock. The findings, therefore, not only further support the hypothesis that a circadian oscillator (perhaps exhibiting limit cycle behavior) can modulate cell division in eukaryotic cells, but also provide a useful basis for the dissection of the nature and extent of the coupling between cell division and circadian cycles.
纤细裸藻(Z株)的细胞分裂节律在通气、磁力搅拌、8升、无菌的分批培养物中以昼夜节律周期(156次监测振荡的周期为30.2±1.8小时)自由运行,该培养物在25℃下以光自养方式生长,从接种时刻起处于LD: 3,3(7500勒克斯,冷白色荧光)6小时光照周期。每隔2小时用自动部分收集器和库尔特电子粒子计数器测量细胞数量。在30小时分裂周期的不同昼夜节律时间,通过在LD: 3,3方案中本应处于黑暗的时间段之一给予光照,对自由运行的细胞群体施加3小时的光扰动。以分裂开始作为相位参考点,在瞬态(如果有的话)消退后(通常在一天或两天内),相对于未受扰动的对照培养物,确定节律的净稳态相位提前或延迟(±Δφ)。同时发现了+Δφ和 -Δφ,在昼夜节律时间(CT)20至22(“断点”)处获得了约±11至12小时的最大值;如果在CT 6和CT 12之间给予光信号,则几乎没有发生相位偏移。通过绘制新相位(φ')与旧相位(φ)得到的相位重置曲线属于0型(“强”)类型。无论何时施加光扰动,都会产生映射到昼夜节律周期相对受限部分(CT 6至CT 13)的新相位。这些数据提供了首个针对昼夜节律有丝分裂时钟的详细相位响应曲线。因此,这些发现不仅进一步支持了昼夜节律振荡器(可能表现出极限环行为)可以调节真核细胞中细胞分裂的假设,还为剖析细胞分裂与昼夜节律周期之间耦合的性质和程度提供了有用的基础。