Spies Christian, Mohrs Oliver K, Madison James R, Fach Andreas, Nowak Bernd, Voigtländer Thomas
Rush University Medical Center Section of Cardiology 1653 West Congress Parkway Chicago, IL 60612 USA.
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2006;8(2):373-9. doi: 10.1080/10976640500452067.
We evaluated flow reserve in non-obstructed bypass grafts supplying infarcted and noninfarcted myocardium. Bypass grafts were examined by phase-contrast flow measurements and myocardial viability was assessed with late enhancement technique. Flow reserve was higher in bypasses supplying normal myocardium compared to those supplying infarcted myocardium (2.9 vs. 1.5, p<.0001). This difference remained significant after adjusting for co-variables. Bypass grafts supplying infarcted myocardium were more likely to have lower flow reserve than those supplying normal myocardium (flow reserve < or =2, 84% vs 18%, p = .0003). Flow reserve is reduced in non-stenosed bypasses supplying infarcted myocardium, likely due to altered microcirculation. Thus, cardiovascular magnetic resonance based bypass assessment must include myocardial viability testing.
我们评估了为梗死心肌和非梗死心肌供血的非阻塞性搭桥血管的血流储备。通过相位对比血流测量检查搭桥血管,并采用延迟强化技术评估心肌活力。与为梗死心肌供血的搭桥血管相比,为正常心肌供血的搭桥血管的血流储备更高(2.9对1.5,p<0.0001)。在对协变量进行调整后,这种差异仍然显著。与为正常心肌供血的搭桥血管相比,为梗死心肌供血的搭桥血管更有可能具有较低的血流储备(血流储备≤2,84%对18%,p = 0.0003)。为梗死心肌供血的无狭窄搭桥血管的血流储备降低,可能是由于微循环改变所致。因此,基于心血管磁共振的搭桥血管评估必须包括心肌活力检测。