• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双膦酸盐类药物在治疗乳腺癌骨转移患者中的成本效益

Cost effectiveness of bisphosphonates in the management of breast cancer patients with bone metastases.

作者信息

Botteman M, Barghout V, Stephens J, Hay J, Brandman J, Aapro M

机构信息

Pharmerit, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA.

出版信息

Ann Oncol. 2006 Jul;17(7):1072-82. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdl093. Epub 2006 May 2.

DOI:10.1093/annonc/mdl093
PMID:16670202
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Bisphosphonates are recommended to prevent skeletal related events (SREs) in patients with breast cancer and bone metastases (BCBM). However, their clinical and economic profiles vary from one agent to the other.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using modeling techniques, we simulated from the perspective of the UK's National Health Service (NHS) the cost and quality adjusted survival (QALY) associated with five commonly-used bisphosphonates or no therapy in this patient population. The simulation followed patients into several health states (i.e. alive or dead, experiencing an SRE or no SRE, and receiving first or second line therapy). Drugs costs, infusion costs, SREs costs, and utility values were estimated from published sources. Utilities were applied to time with and without SREs to capture the impact on quality of life.

RESULTS

Compared to no therapy, all bisphosphonates are either cost saving or highly cost-effective (with a cost per QALY < or = 6126 pounds sterlings). Within this evaluation, zoledronic acid was more effective and less expensive than all other options.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our model, the use of bisphosphonates in breast cancer patients with bone metastases should lead to improved patient outcomes and cost savings to the NHS and possibly other similar entities.

摘要

背景

双膦酸盐类药物被推荐用于预防乳腺癌骨转移(BCBM)患者的骨相关事件(SREs)。然而,不同药物的临床和经济学特征存在差异。

材料与方法

我们采用建模技术,从英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)的角度模拟了在该患者群体中,使用五种常用双膦酸盐类药物或不进行治疗所产生的成本及质量调整生存期(QALY)。该模拟跟踪患者进入多种健康状态(即存活或死亡、发生或未发生SRE、接受一线或二线治疗)。药物成本、输注成本、SREs成本及效用值均根据已发表资料估算。将效用值应用于发生和未发生SREs的时间段,以反映对生活质量的影响。

结果

与不进行治疗相比,所有双膦酸盐类药物均具有成本节约或高成本效益(每QALY成本≤6126英镑)。在此评估中,唑来膦酸比所有其他选择更有效且成本更低。

结论

基于我们的模型,在乳腺癌骨转移患者中使用双膦酸盐类药物应能改善患者预后,并为NHS及其他类似机构节省成本。

相似文献

1
Cost effectiveness of bisphosphonates in the management of breast cancer patients with bone metastases.双膦酸盐类药物在治疗乳腺癌骨转移患者中的成本效益
Ann Oncol. 2006 Jul;17(7):1072-82. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdl093. Epub 2006 May 2.
2
Pharmacoeconomics of bisphosphonates for skeletal-related event prevention in metastatic non-breast solid tumours.双膦酸盐类药物在预防转移性非乳腺癌实体瘤骨骼相关事件中的药物经济学评价。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2012 May;30(5):373-86. doi: 10.2165/11631390-000000000-00000.
3
Cost-effectiveness of oral ibandronate versus IV zoledronic acid or IV pamidronate for bone metastases in patients receiving oral hormonal therapy for breast cancer in the United Kingdom.在英国,口服伊班膦酸钠与静脉注射唑来膦酸或静脉注射帕米膦酸治疗接受口服激素治疗的乳腺癌骨转移患者的成本效益
Clin Ther. 2005 Aug;27(8):1295-310. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.08.006.
4
Economic evaluation of denosumab compared with zoledronic acid in hormone-refractory prostate cancer patients with bone metastases.地诺单抗与唑来膦酸治疗激素难治性前列腺癌骨转移患者的经济学评价
J Manag Care Pharm. 2011 Oct;17(8):621-43. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2011.17.8.621.
5
Zoledronic acid: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in the management of bone metastases.唑来膦酸:其用于治疗骨转移的药物经济学综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2008;26(3):251-68. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200826030-00007.
6
Cost-effectiveness of denosumab compared with zoledronic acid in patients with breast cancer and bone metastases.地舒单抗对比唑来膦酸在乳腺癌伴骨转移患者中的成本效果分析。
Clin Breast Cancer. 2012 Aug;12(4):247-58. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2012.04.001. Epub 2012 Jun 12.
7
Cost-effectiveness of denosumab versus zoledronic acid in the management of skeletal metastases secondary to breast cancer.地舒单抗对比唑来膦酸治疗乳腺癌骨转移的成本效果分析。
Clin Ther. 2012 Jun;34(6):1334-49. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2012.04.008. Epub 2012 May 11.
8
Bisphosphonates and other bone agents for breast cancer.用于乳腺癌的双膦酸盐及其他骨药物。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Feb 15(2):CD003474. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003474.pub3.
9
Cost-effectiveness of oral ibandronate compared with intravenous (i.v.) zoledronic acid or i.v. generic pamidronate in breast cancer patients with metastatic bone disease undergoing i.v. chemotherapy.口服伊班膦酸钠与静脉注射唑来膦酸或静脉注射普通帕米膦酸在接受静脉化疗的转移性骨病乳腺癌患者中的成本效益。
Support Care Cancer. 2005 Dec;13(12):975-86. doi: 10.1007/s00520-005-0828-1. Epub 2005 May 4.
10
Cost-effectiveness of denosumab vs zoledronic acid for prevention of skeletal-related events in patients with solid tumors and bone metastases in the United States.在美国,地舒单抗与唑来膦酸预防实体瘤伴骨转移患者骨骼相关事件的成本效果比较。
J Med Econ. 2012;15(4):712-23. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2012.675380. Epub 2012 Mar 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Management of bone metastasis with zoledronic acid: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.唑来膦酸治疗骨转移:系统评价与贝叶斯网络Meta分析
J Bone Oncol. 2023 Feb 9;39:100470. doi: 10.1016/j.jbo.2023.100470. eCollection 2023 Apr.
2
Prospective analysis of the association between skeletal-related events and quality of life in patients with advanced lung cancer (CSP-HOR13).晚期肺癌患者骨相关事件与生活质量关联的前瞻性分析(CSP-HOR13)
Oncol Lett. 2019 Jan;17(1):1320-1326. doi: 10.3892/ol.2018.9680. Epub 2018 Nov 9.
3
Cost-Effectiveness of Treatments for the Management of Bone Metastases: A Systematic Literature Review.
治疗骨转移管理的成本效益:系统文献回顾。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2018 Mar;36(3):301-322. doi: 10.1007/s40273-017-0595-0.
4
Cost-Effectiveness of Zoledronic Acid to Prevent and Treat Postmenopausal Osteoporosis in Comparison with Routine Medical Treatment.唑来膦酸与常规药物治疗相比预防和治疗绝经后骨质疏松症的成本效益
Electron Physician. 2016 Dec 25;8(12):3434-3440. doi: 10.19082/3434. eCollection 2016 Dec.
5
Health resource utilization associated with skeletal-related events: results from a retrospective European study.与骨相关事件相关的卫生资源利用:一项欧洲回顾性研究的结果
Eur J Health Econ. 2016 Jul;17(6):711-21. doi: 10.1007/s10198-015-0716-7. Epub 2015 Aug 8.
6
Reducing the burden of bone metastases: current concepts and treatment options.减轻骨转移负担:当前的概念和治疗选择。
Support Care Cancer. 2013 Jun;21(6):1773-83. doi: 10.1007/s00520-013-1755-1. Epub 2013 Mar 7.
7
Pharmacoeconomic considerations in the treatment of breast cancer.乳腺癌治疗中的药物经济学考量
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2010;2:47-61. Epub 2010 Jun 15.
8
Quality of life implications of bisphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis of the jaw.双膦酸盐相关性颌骨骨坏死的生活质量影响。
Oncologist. 2011;16(1):121-32. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2010-0183. Epub 2011 Jan 6.
9
Cost-effectiveness of zoledronic acid in the prevention of skeletal-related events in patients with bone metastases secondary to advanced renal cell carcinoma: application to France, Germany, and the United Kingdom.唑来膦酸预防晚期肾细胞癌骨转移患者骨骼相关事件的成本效果:在法国、德国和英国的应用。
Eur J Health Econ. 2011 Dec;12(6):575-88. doi: 10.1007/s10198-010-0272-0. Epub 2010 Aug 31.
10
Zoledronic acid: a review of its use in breast cancer.唑来膦酸:其在乳腺癌治疗中的应用综述
Drugs. 2008;68(18):2661-82. doi: 10.2165/0003495-200868180-00010.