Aaltonen K, Ahlin C, Amini R-M, Salonen L, Fjällskog M-L, Heikkilä P, Nevanlinna H, Blomqvist C
Department of Oncology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, PO Box 180, FIN 00290 HUS, Finland.
Br J Cancer. 2006 Jun 5;94(11):1697-702. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603147.
Cyclin A has in some studies been associated with poor breast cancer survival, although all studies have not confirmed this. Its prognostic significance in breast cancer needs evaluation in larger studies. Tissue microarray (TMA) technique allows a simultaneous analysis of large amount of tumours on a single microscopic slide. This makes a rapid screening of molecular markers in large amount of tumours possible. Because only a small tissue sample of each tumour is punched on an array, the question has arisen about the representativeness of TMA when studying markers that are expressed in only a small proportion of cells. For this reason, we wanted to compare cyclin A expression on TMA and on traditional large sections. Two breast cancer TMAs were constructed of 200 breast tumours diagnosed between 1997-1998. TMA slides and traditional large section slides of these 200 tumours were stained with cyclin A antibody and analysed by two independent readers. The reproducibility of the two readers' results was good or even very good, with kappa values 0.71-0.87. The agreement of TMA and large section results was good with kappa value 0.62-0.75. Cyclin A overexpression was significantly (P<0.001) associated with oestrogen receptor and progesterone receptor negativity and high grade both on TMA and large sections. Cyclin A overexpression was significantly associated with poor metastasis-free survival both on TMA and large sections. The relative risks for metastasis were similar on TMA and large sections. This study suggests that TMA technique could be useful to study histological correlations and prognostic significance of cyclin A on breast cancer on a large scale.
在一些研究中,细胞周期蛋白A与乳腺癌患者较差的生存率相关,不过并非所有研究都证实了这一点。其在乳腺癌中的预后意义需要在更大规模的研究中进行评估。组织微阵列(TMA)技术能够在一张显微镜载玻片上同时分析大量肿瘤。这使得在大量肿瘤中快速筛选分子标志物成为可能。由于每个肿瘤仅在阵列上打孔获取一小部分组织样本,因此在研究仅在一小部分细胞中表达的标志物时,TMA的代表性问题就出现了。出于这个原因,我们想比较TMA和传统大切片上细胞周期蛋白A的表达情况。用1997年至1998年间诊断的200例乳腺肿瘤构建了两个乳腺癌TMA。用细胞周期蛋白A抗体对这200个肿瘤的TMA载玻片和传统大切片载玻片进行染色,并由两名独立的阅片者进行分析。两名阅片者结果的重复性良好甚至非常好,kappa值为0.71 - 0.87。TMA和大切片结果的一致性良好,kappa值为0.62 - 0.75。在TMA和大切片上,细胞周期蛋白A过表达均与雌激素受体和孕激素受体阴性以及高级别显著相关(P<0.001)。在TMA和大切片上,细胞周期蛋白A过表达均与无转移生存期差显著相关。TMA和大切片上转移的相对风险相似。这项研究表明,TMA技术可能有助于大规模研究细胞周期蛋白A在乳腺癌中的组织学相关性和预后意义。