Lee Meei-Shyuan, Pan Wen-Harn, Liu Kai-Li, Yu Mei-Shu
School of Public Health, National Defense Medical Center, 161 Sec. 6, Minchuan East Road, Taipei 114, Taiwan, ROC.
Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2006;15(2):161-9.
A 64-item Chinese food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) combined with open questions on types of staples and cooking oil most frequently consumed was designed for a prospective study in Taiwan to appraise participants' usual intake. We examined its reproducibility and validity. The form was administered three times at three-month intervals by face-to-face interview to 83 senior college students majoring in nutrition, in order to recall their usual dietary intake over the past six months. They also completed five-day (includes both weekends) diet records (DR) after each interview. Averaged intake levels of most nutrients assessed by the three FFQs were slightly higher than those of 15-day DR. Intraclass correlation coefficients for nutrient intakes assessed by three FFQs three months apart ranged from 0.37 for saturated fat to 0.82 for alcohol (average: 0.52). Averaged Pearson correlation coefficients between the unadjusted and energy-adjusted nutrient intakes measured by DR and by the third FFQ (which asked about diet during the six months encompassing the diet records) were 0.40 and 0.35, respectively, not including vitamins A and C. These correlations were higher (average: 0.47) after adjusting for the daily variation of the diet records. On average, 50% subjects were correctly classified into the same tertiles by both methods; 11% of the subjects were misclassified to extreme categories. These data indicate that this FFQ for Chinese-speaking people in Taiwan is reproducible and provides a useful measure of intake for many nutrients over a six-month period.
为了在台湾进行一项前瞻性研究以评估参与者的日常摄入量,设计了一份包含64个条目的中国食物频率问卷(FFQ),并结合了关于最常食用的主食和食用油种类的开放性问题。我们检验了其重现性和有效性。通过面对面访谈,每三个月对83名营养专业的高年级大学生发放一次问卷,以回忆他们过去六个月的日常饮食摄入量。每次访谈后,他们还需完成为期五天(包括周末)的饮食记录(DR)。三次FFQ评估的大多数营养素的平均摄入量略高于15天饮食记录的摄入量。相隔三个月的三次FFQ评估的营养素摄入量的组内相关系数范围从饱和脂肪的0.37到酒精的0.82(平均:0.52)。DR和第三次FFQ(询问涵盖饮食记录的六个月期间的饮食情况)测量的未调整和能量调整后的营养素摄入量之间的平均Pearson相关系数分别为0.40和0.35,不包括维生素A和C。在调整饮食记录的每日变化后,这些相关性更高(平均:0.47)。平均而言,两种方法将50%的受试者正确分类到相同的三分位数;11%的受试者被错误分类到极端类别。这些数据表明,这份针对台湾说中文人群的FFQ具有重现性,并能在六个月期间为许多营养素的摄入量提供有用的测量方法。