Kriska Andrea M, Edelstein Sharon L, Hamman Richard F, Otto Amy, Bray George A, Mayer-Davis Elizabeth J, Wing Rena R, Horton Edward S, Haffner Steven M, Regensteiner Judith G
Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group, George Washington University, Rockville, MD 20852, USA.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006 May;38(5):826-32. doi: 10.1249/01.mss.0000218138.91812.f9.
Leisure physical activity was assessed using questionnaires with different time frames in the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) cohort of 3234 overweight individuals aged > 25 yr with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) from 27 centers across the United States. The three questionnaires were the Modifiable Activity Questionnaire (MAQ; past year), the Low-Level Physical Activity Recall (LOPAR; past 7 d), and the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III; past month). This provided the opportunity to examine the relationship between the three activity measures and to compare activity levels of the DPP sample with that of a national sample with IGT.
Leisure activity determined by the three questionnaires significantly correlated with each other, although the correlations between MAQ and NHANES III were stronger (men: rho = 0.52; women: rho = 0.49; P < 0.01) than between LOPAR and either measure (men: rho = 0.20 for MAQ, 0.24 for NHANES; women: rho = 0.10 for MAQ, 0.13 for NHANES). In the DPP, measures of obesity and glucose tolerance were significantly correlated with activity levels determined by MAQ and NHANES, but not LOPAR. Activity levels in DPP participants determined by the NHANES III questionnaire were generally higher than those reported by individuals meeting DPP eligibility criteria who were part of the NHANES cohort for similar age, body mass index, and race or ethnicity.
If the DPP participants were more active than a national sample of individuals with IGT, this would have implications for translation when using the DPP lifestyle intervention in less active or less motivated populations. Finally, the weak relationship between activity levels obtained with MAQ and LOPAR may result from the fact that they encompass different time frames and different components of leisure activity.
在美国27个中心的3234名年龄大于25岁且糖耐量受损(IGT)的超重个体组成的糖尿病预防计划(DPP)队列中,使用具有不同时间框架的问卷评估休闲体育活动。这三份问卷分别是可改变活动问卷(MAQ;过去一年)、低水平体育活动回忆问卷(LOPAR;过去7天)和第三次全国健康与营养检查调查(NHANES III;过去一个月)。这为研究这三种活动测量方法之间的关系以及将DPP样本的活动水平与全国IGT样本的活动水平进行比较提供了机会。
尽管MAQ与NHANES III之间的相关性(男性:rho = 0.52;女性:rho = 0.49;P < 0.01)比LOPAR与其他任何一种测量方法之间的相关性(男性:与MAQ的rho = 0.20,与NHANES的rho = 0.24;女性:与MAQ的rho = 0.10,与NHANES的rho = 0.13)更强,但由这三份问卷确定的休闲活动彼此之间显著相关。在DPP中,肥胖和糖耐量的测量指标与由MAQ和NHANES确定的活动水平显著相关,但与LOPAR无关。由NHANES III问卷确定的DPP参与者的活动水平总体上高于符合DPP资格标准且年龄、体重指数和种族或族裔相似的NHANES队列中的个体报告的活动水平。
如果DPP参与者比全国IGT个体样本更活跃,那么在将DPP生活方式干预应用于活动较少或积极性较低的人群时,这将对转化产生影响。最后,MAQ和LOPAR获得的活动水平之间的弱关系可能是因为它们涵盖不同的时间框架和休闲活动的不同组成部分。