Suppr超能文献

醋氯芬酸与安慰剂及萘普生治疗原发性痛经女性的疗效和安全性比较

The efficacy and safety of aceclofenac versus placebo and naproxen in women with primary dysmenorrhoea.

作者信息

Letzel Heinz, Mégard Yves, Lamarca Rosa, Raber Anna, Fortea Josep

机构信息

Humanwissenschaftliches Zentrum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, 80336 München, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006 Dec;129(2):162-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.01.004. Epub 2006 May 3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the analgesic efficacy and safety of a single oral dose of aceclofenac 100 mg and compare that with placebo and naproxen 500 mg in women with primary dysmenorrhoea.

STUDY DESIGN

In this double-blind, prospective, multicentre, randomised, three-way, crossover study, women were randomly assigned to receive one of six treatment sequences, comprising single oral doses of aceclofenac 100 mg, naproxen 500 mg or placebo, when menstrual pain reached a predetermined level of severity. A single dose of the assigned study medication was taken on three menstrual periods; a different medication was taken on each treatment day. Analgesic efficacy was determined by self-reported analgesia scoring and participants' and investigators' global evaluation of treatment effectiveness. Measurements also included physical examination and adverse events.

RESULTS

Total pain relief scores were not statistically significantly different for aceclofenac and naproxen, and both were statistically significantly more effective than placebo (p = 0.019 and 0.002, respectively). This finding was supported by secondary endpoints including sum of pain intensity differences (SPID/8), peak analgesia (peak pain intensity and peak pain relief), and participants' and investigators' overall evaluation of effectiveness. Both aceclofenac and naproxen were well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Aceclofenac (100 mg) and naproxen (500 mg) effectively treated the pain associated with primary dysmenorrhoea, and both were more effective than placebo at easing menstrual pain assessed by various pain relief criteria.

摘要

目的

确定单次口服100毫克醋氯芬酸的镇痛效果及安全性,并将其与安慰剂和500毫克萘普生在原发性痛经女性中的效果进行比较。

研究设计

在这项双盲、前瞻性、多中心、随机、三向交叉研究中,当痛经达到预定严重程度时,女性被随机分配接受六种治疗顺序之一,包括单次口服100毫克醋氯芬酸、500毫克萘普生或安慰剂。在三个月经周期服用一剂指定的研究药物;每个治疗日服用不同的药物。镇痛效果通过自我报告的镇痛评分以及参与者和研究者对治疗效果的总体评估来确定。测量还包括体格检查和不良事件。

结果

醋氯芬酸和萘普生的总疼痛缓解评分在统计学上无显著差异,且两者在统计学上均比安慰剂更有效(分别为p = 0.019和0.002)。这一发现得到了次要终点的支持,包括疼痛强度差异总和(SPID/8)、峰值镇痛(峰值疼痛强度和峰值疼痛缓解)以及参与者和研究者对有效性的总体评估。醋氯芬酸和萘普生耐受性均良好。

结论

醋氯芬酸(100毫克)和萘普生(500毫克)能有效治疗原发性痛经相关疼痛,根据各种疼痛缓解标准评估,两者在缓解痛经方面均比安慰剂更有效。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验