Slotkin Theodore A, Levin Edward D, Seidler Frederic J
Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA.
Environ Health Perspect. 2006 May;114(5):746-51. doi: 10.1289/ehp.8828.
A comparative approach to the differences between systemic toxicity and developmental neurotoxicity of organophosphates is critical to determine the degree to which multiple mechanisms of toxicity carry across different members of this class of insecticides. We contrasted neuritic outgrowth and cholinergic synaptic development in neonatal rats given different organophosphates (chlorpyrifos, diazinon, parathion) at doses spanning the threshold for impaired growth and viability. Animals were treated daily on postnatal days 1-4 by subcutaneous injection so as to bypass differences in first-pass activation to the oxon or catabolism to inactive products. Evaluations occurred on day 5. Parathion (maximum tolerated dose, 0.1 mg/kg) was far more systemically toxic than was chlorpyrifos or diazinon (maximum tolerated dose, 1-5 mg/kg). Below the maximum tolerated dose, diazinon impaired neuritic outgrowth in the forebrain and brainstem, evidenced by a deficit in the ratio of membrane protein to total protein. Diazinon also decreased choline acetyltransferase activity, a cholinergic neuronal marker, whereas it did not affect hemicholinium-3 binding to the presynaptic choline transporter, an index of cholinergic neuronal activity. There was no m(subscript)2(/subscript)-muscarinic acetylcholine receptor down-regulation, as would have occurred with chronic cholinergic hyperstimulation. The same pattern was found previously for chlorpyrifos. In contrast, parathion did not elicit any of these changes at its maximum tolerated dose. These results indicate a complete dichotomy between the systemic toxicity of organophosphates and their propensity to elicit developmental neurotoxicity. For parathion, the threshold for lethality lies below that necessary for adverse effects on brain development, whereas the opposite is true for chlorpyrifos and diazinon.
采用比较的方法研究有机磷化合物的全身毒性和发育神经毒性之间的差异,对于确定多种毒性机制在这类杀虫剂不同成员之间的传递程度至关重要。我们对比了新生大鼠在给予不同有机磷化合物(毒死蜱、二嗪农、对硫磷)后神经突生长和胆碱能突触发育情况,所给剂量涵盖生长和活力受损阈值。在出生后第1至4天,通过皮下注射对动物进行每日治疗,以绕过对氧磷首过激活或分解为无活性产物过程中的差异。在第5天进行评估。对硫磷(最大耐受剂量,0.1毫克/千克)的全身毒性远高于毒死蜱或二嗪农(最大耐受剂量,1 - 5毫克/千克)。在最大耐受剂量以下,二嗪农损害前脑和脑干的神经突生长,表现为膜蛋白与总蛋白比率降低。二嗪农还降低了胆碱能神经元标志物胆碱乙酰转移酶的活性,而它不影响半胱氨酸 - 3与突触前胆碱转运体的结合,后者是胆碱能神经元活性指标。不存在如慢性胆碱能过度刺激时会出现的M₂毒蕈碱型乙酰胆碱受体下调情况。之前对毒死蜱也发现了相同模式。相比之下,对硫磷在其最大耐受剂量下未引发任何这些变化。这些结果表明有机磷化合物的全身毒性与其引发发育神经毒性的倾向之间存在完全的二分法。对于对硫磷,致死阈值低于对脑发育产生不良影响所需的阈值,而对于毒死蜱和二嗪农则相反。