Suppr超能文献

豚鼠肠系膜动脉中神经传导与神经干及跨壁场刺激的比较。

Comparison of neurotransmission with nerve trunk and transmural field stimulation in guinea-pig mesenteric artery.

作者信息

Keef K D, Hottenstein O D, Meehan A G, Anthony T L, Kreulen D L

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson 85724.

出版信息

J Physiol. 1991 Sep;441:367-83. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1991.sp018756.

Abstract
  1. Intracellular electrical and contractile responses to sympathetic nerve trunk stimulation (NTS) and transmural electrical field stimulation (TMS) were compared in the guinea-pig mesenteric artery in vitro. 2. Step increases in voltage with NTS gave rise to excitatory junctional potentials (EJPs) which reached a plateau amplitude of 5-10 mV, whereas with TMS larger amplitude EJPs and sometimes action potentials were obtained. 3. EJPs of equal amplitude (1-7 mV) elicited with TMS and NTS had the same rise time, duration and decay half-time. 4. Slow depolarization obtained with repetitive stimulation was significantly greater in amplitude with TMS than with NTS. 5. Equal amplitude EJPs were obtained throughout the preparation with NTS. With TMS, the amplitude of responses declined substantially with distance from the stimulating electrodes. 6. Tetrodotoxin (TTX) completely blocked EJPs, slow depolarization and contraction with NTS; however, with TMS a TTX-resistant component was observed. The TTX-resistant response to TMS was abolished in the presence of a low-Ca2+ superfusion solution but was not affected by endothelium removal. 7. Phentolamine or prazosin abolished slow depolarization but not EJPs with NTS or TMS. Prazosin abolished contraction with NTS and reduced but did not abolish contraction with TMS. 8. alpha, beta-Methylene ATP abolished EJPs with NTS, whereas with TMS only EJPs obtained with low stimulus intensities were abolished. alpha, beta-Methylene ATP did not block contraction with either NTS or TMS. 9. Combined TTX, prazosin and alpha, beta-methylene ATP abolished EJPs initiated with TMS at all but the highest stimulus intensities (12-20 V, 0.3 ms duration). 10. It is concluded that responses obtained with NTS can be reliably attributed to the release of transmitter by the conduction of action potentials in paravascular nerves, whereas activation by TMS is a more complex phenomenon dependent upon stimulus strength and probably involving multiple forms of activation.
摘要
  1. 在体外对豚鼠肠系膜动脉比较了对交感神经干刺激(NTS)和透壁电场刺激(TMS)的细胞内电反应和收缩反应。2. NTS引起的电压逐步升高产生兴奋性接头电位(EJP),其达到5 - 10 mV的平台幅度,而TMS可获得更大幅度的EJP,有时还可获得动作电位。3. TMS和NTS引发的等幅度(1 - 7 mV)的EJP具有相同的上升时间、持续时间和衰减半衰期。4. 重复刺激获得的缓慢去极化在幅度上TMS比NTS显著更大。5. NTS在整个标本中获得等幅度的EJP。对于TMS,反应幅度随与刺激电极距离的增加而大幅下降。6. 河豚毒素(TTX)完全阻断NTS引起的EJP、缓慢去极化和收缩;然而,对于TMS,观察到一个TTX抗性成分。在低钙灌注溶液存在下,对TMS的TTX抗性反应被消除,但不受内皮去除的影响。7. 酚妥拉明或哌唑嗪消除NTS或TMS引起的缓慢去极化,但不消除EJP。哌唑嗪消除NTS引起的收缩,并减弱但不消除TMS引起的收缩。8. α,β - 亚甲基ATP消除NTS引起的EJP,而对于TMS,仅消除低刺激强度下获得的EJP。α,β - 亚甲基ATP不阻断NTS或TMS引起的收缩。9. 联合使用TTX、哌唑嗪和α,β - 亚甲基ATP除了在最高刺激强度(12 - 20 V,持续时间0.3 ms)外,消除了TMS引发的EJP。10. 得出的结论是,NTS获得的反应可可靠地归因于血管旁神经中动作电位传导导致的递质释放,而TMS激活则是一种更复杂的现象,取决于刺激强度,可能涉及多种激活形式。
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f313/1180203/72d55c7808a0/jphysiol00441-0386-a.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验