O'Rourke Maria, Richardson Lynne D, Wilets Ilene, D'Onofrio Gail
Department of Emergency Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
J Emerg Med. 2006 Apr;30(3):263-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2005.05.031.
To determine whether emergency physicians' (EPs) attitudes affect their support and practice of brief intervention in the Emergency Department (ED), EPs completed an anonymous survey. EPs were asked about their attitudes toward patients with alcohol problems, current ED screening, use of brief intervention, and barriers to use of brief intervention. Chi-square analysis was used and a step-wise regression model was constructed. Respondents reported a high prevalence of patients with alcohol-related problems: 18% in a typical shift. Eighty-one percent said it is important to advise patients to change behavior; half said using a brief intervention is important. Attending physicians had significantly less alcohol education than residents, but were significantly more likely to support the use of brief intervention. Support was not associated with gender, race, census, hours of education, or personal experience. EPs who felt that brief intervention was an integral part of their job were more likely to use it in their daily practice.
为了确定急诊医生(EPs)的态度是否会影响他们在急诊科(ED)对简短干预的支持和实践,急诊医生完成了一项匿名调查。调查询问了急诊医生对有酒精问题患者的态度、当前急诊科的筛查情况、简短干预的使用情况以及使用简短干预的障碍。采用卡方分析并构建了逐步回归模型。受访者报告称,与酒精相关问题的患者患病率很高:在一个典型班次中占18%。81%的人表示建议患者改变行为很重要;一半的人表示使用简短干预很重要。主治医生接受的酒精教育明显少于住院医生,但他们支持使用简短干预的可能性明显更高。支持与否与性别、种族、人口普查、教育时长或个人经历无关。认为简短干预是其工作不可或缺一部分的急诊医生在日常实践中更有可能使用它。