Ameratunga Shanthi, Hijar Martha, Norton Robyn
Injury Prevention Research Centre, School of Population Health, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Lancet. 2006 May 6;367(9521):1533-40. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68654-6.
Evidence suggests that the present and projected global burden of road-traffic injuries is disproportionately borne by countries that can least afford to meet the health service, economic, and societal challenges posed. Although the evidence base on which these estimates are made remains somewhat precarious in view of the limited data systems in most low-income and middle-income countries (as per the classification on the World Bank website), these projections highlight the essential need to address road-traffic injuries as a public-health priority. Most well-evaluated effective interventions do not directly focus on efforts to protect vulnerable road users, such as motorcyclists and pedestrians. Yet, these groups comprise the majority of road-traffic victims in low-income and middle-income countries, and consequently, the majority of the road-traffic victims globally. Appropriately responding to these disparities in available evidence and prevention efforts is necessary if we are to comprehensively address this global-health dilemma.
有证据表明,目前和预计的全球道路交通伤害负担,在那些最无力应对所带来的卫生服务、经济和社会挑战的国家中,分布极不均衡。尽管鉴于大多数低收入和中等收入国家(按照世界银行网站的分类)的数据系统有限,做出这些估计所依据的证据基础仍有些不稳定,但这些预测凸显了将道路交通伤害作为公共卫生优先事项加以应对的迫切必要性。大多数经过充分评估的有效干预措施并未直接着眼于保护弱势道路使用者的努力,比如骑摩托车者和行人。然而,这些群体在低收入和中等收入国家的道路交通受害者中占大多数,因此在全球道路交通受害者中也占大多数。如果我们要全面应对这一全球卫生困境,就必须妥善应对现有证据和预防工作方面的这些差异。