• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从施暴者手中收缴枪支:公众支持及政策影响。

Taking guns from batterers: public support and policy implications.

作者信息

Sorenson Susan B

机构信息

School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

出版信息

Eval Rev. 2006 Jun;30(3):361-73. doi: 10.1177/0193841X06287217.

DOI:10.1177/0193841X06287217
PMID:16679501
Abstract

Federal law prohibits the purchase or possession of a firearm by persons convicted of misdemeanor domestic violence and those under certain domestic violence restraining orders. The purpose of this investigation is to examine public sentiment about the removal of firearms in the absence of a restraining order or misdemeanor conviction following domestic violence. An experimental vignette design was used in a telephone survey of a cross-sectional statewide sample of 522 community-residing adults in California. Study design and population weights were applied; the findings, thus, are a reasonable approximation for the population of California. In more than 3,500 vignettes, the abusive behavior was judged to be wrong, illegal, or should be illegal (98.7%, 73.1%, and 77.7%, respectively). Although only about one half (56.5%) of the scenarios were thought to merit the issuance of a restraining order, three fourths (77.4%) were thought to merit the removal of firearms. Multivariate analyses indicated greater support for firearms removal when the abuse involved sexual or physical abuse (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] ranged from 2.65 to 5.64) or a gun (AOR = 6.54). Men were the sole population group with significantly lower support for firearm removal following domestic violence (AOR = 0.39). The men who wanted firearms to remain did not differ from other men on any of the measured variables. In sum, there is substantial support, especially when a gun is displayed in a domestic violence incident, for policies requiring the removal of firearms from abusers.

摘要

联邦法律禁止被判定犯有轻罪家庭暴力罪的人和处于某些家庭暴力限制令之下的人购买或持有枪支。本调查的目的是研究在家庭暴力发生后,在没有限制令或轻罪定罪的情况下,公众对收缴枪支的看法。在对加利福尼亚州522名居住在社区的成年人进行的全州横断面电话调查中,采用了实验性 vignette 设计。应用了研究设计和总体权重;因此,研究结果是加利福尼亚州总体情况的合理近似值。在3500多个 vignette 中,虐待行为被判定为错误、非法或应该是非法的(分别为98.7%、73.1%和77.7%)。虽然只有大约一半(56.5%)的情况被认为值得发布限制令,但四分之三(77.4%)的情况被认为值得收缴枪支。多变量分析表明,当虐待涉及性虐待或身体虐待(调整后的优势比[AOR]范围为2.65至5.64)或枪支(AOR = 6.54)时,对收缴枪支的支持度更高。男性是唯一一个在家庭暴力后对收缴枪支支持度显著较低的人群组(AOR = 0.39)。希望保留枪支的男性在任何测量变量上与其他男性没有差异。总之,对于要求从施虐者手中收缴枪支的政策,存在大量支持,特别是当家庭暴力事件中出现枪支时。

相似文献

1
Taking guns from batterers: public support and policy implications.从施暴者手中收缴枪支:公众支持及政策影响。
Eval Rev. 2006 Jun;30(3):361-73. doi: 10.1177/0193841X06287217.
2
Separating batterers and guns: a review and analysis of gun removal laws in 50 States.将施暴者与枪支分离:对50个州枪支收缴法律的回顾与分析
Eval Rev. 2006 Jun;30(3):296-312. doi: 10.1177/0193841X06287680.
3
Disarming batterers through restraining orders: the promise and the reality in California.通过限制令制服施暴者:加利福尼亚州的前景与现实
Eval Rev. 2006 Jun;30(3):245-65. doi: 10.1177/0193841X06287675.
4
Do laws restricting access to firearms by domestic violence offenders prevent intimate partner homicide?限制家庭暴力罪犯获取枪支的法律能否预防亲密伴侣杀人案?
Eval Rev. 2006 Jun;30(3):313-46. doi: 10.1177/0193841X06287307.
5
Removing guns from batterers: findings from a pilot survey of domestic violence restraining order recipients in California.从加利福尼亚州的家庭暴力限制令接受者的试点调查中获取的有关收缴施虐者枪支的信息。
Violence Against Women. 2013 May;19(5):602-16. doi: 10.1177/1077801213490561. Epub 2013 Jun 12.
6
Are temporary restraining orders more likely to be issued when applications mention firearms?当申请提及枪支时,临时限制令是否更有可能被发布?
Eval Rev. 2006 Jun;30(3):266-82. doi: 10.1177/0193841X06287403.
7
Domestic violence and firearms: reflections of a prosecutor.家庭暴力与枪支:一名检察官的思考
Eval Rev. 2006 Jun;30(3):237-44. doi: 10.1177/0193841X06287818.
8
Reversing the historical tide of iatrogenic harm: A therapeutic jurisprudence analysis of increases in arrests of domestic batterers and rapists.扭转医源性伤害的历史潮流:对增加逮捕家庭暴力犯和强奸犯的治疗法学分析。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2010 Nov-Dec;33(5-6):306-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2010.09.003. Epub 2010 Nov 9.
9
Future law enforcement officers and social workers: perceptions of domestic violence.未来的执法官员和社会工作者:对家庭暴力的看法。
J Interpers Violence. 2010 Aug;25(8):1367-87. doi: 10.1177/0886260509346062. Epub 2009 Oct 29.
10
Understanding and informing policy implementation: a case study of the domestic violence provisions of the Maryland Gun Violence Act.理解并为政策实施提供信息:以《马里兰州枪支暴力法案》中家庭暴力条款为例的案例研究
Eval Rev. 2006 Jun;30(3):347-60. doi: 10.1177/0193841X06287684.

引用本文的文献

1
Guns in Intimate Partner Violence: Comparing Incidents by Type of Weapon.亲密伴侣暴力中的枪支:按武器类型比较事件
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2017 Mar;26(3):249-258. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2016.5832. Epub 2017 Jan 30.
2
Firearms and the incidence of arrest among respondents to domestic violence restraining orders.家庭暴力限制令受访者中的枪支与逮捕发生率
Inj Epidemiol. 2015 Dec;2(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s40621-015-0047-2. Epub 2015 Jun 23.