Glannon Walter
Department of Philosophy, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4, Canada.
Bioethics. 2006 Feb;20(1):37-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2006.00474.x.
Neuroimaging, psychosurgery, deep-brain stimulation, and psychopharmacology hold considerable promise for more accurate prediction and diagnosis and more effective treatment of neurological and psychiatric disorders. Some forms of psychopharmacology may even be able to enhance normal cognitive and affective capacities. But the brain remains the most complex and least understood of all the organs in the human body. Mapping the neural correlates of the mind through brain scans, and altering these correlates through surgery, stimulation, or pharmacological interventions can affect us in both positive and negative ways. We need to carefully weigh the potential benefit against the potential harm of such techniques. This paper examines some of these techniques and explores the emerging ethical issues in clinical neuroscience.
神经成像、精神外科手术、深部脑刺激和精神药理学在更准确的预测和诊断以及更有效地治疗神经和精神疾病方面有着巨大的前景。某些形式的精神药理学甚至可能能够增强正常的认知和情感能力。但是,大脑仍然是人体所有器官中最复杂且最不为人所了解的。通过脑部扫描绘制心理的神经关联,并通过手术、刺激或药物干预改变这些关联,可能会对我们产生积极和消极的影响。我们需要仔细权衡这些技术的潜在益处与潜在危害。本文研究了其中一些技术,并探讨了临床神经科学中出现的伦理问题。