Sun Manlin, Shui Yusen, Zhang Yuqiang, Ma Ruiyang, Zhao Yuwei, Chen Hongyu, Yu Ping, Li Zhi, Wu Tingting, Yu Haiyang
State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases and Department of Prosthodontics, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Int J Dent. 2024 Jan 16;2024:5768318. doi: 10.1155/2024/5768318. eCollection 2024.
To evaluate the influence of screw-tightening methods on the immediate and long-term stability of dental implant screw joints. . A total of 150 implants of three different implant systems with different diameters were used in this study. Each group was divided into three subgroups ( = 5), according to the tightening methods (A-tightening with recommended torque and retorque after 10 min; B-tightening with recommended torque, then loosening and immediate retorque; C-tightening with recommended torque only once). The operating time of tightening the assemblies was recorded. Ten minutes later, the immediate removal torque (IRT) (Ncm) was measured. After retightening the assemblies, a dynamic load between 20 and 200 N was applied for 10 cycles, and the postloading removal torque (PRT) (Ncm) was measured. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to observe the surface topography of the screws.
For different types of implants, the IRTs were 11.92 ± 1.04-34.12 ± 0.36 Ncm for method A, 11.64 ± 0.57-33.96 ± 0.29 Ncm for method B, and 10.30 ± 0.41-31.62 ± 0.52 Ncm for method C, and the IRTs of methods A and B were 6.28%-21.58% higher than that of method C ( ≤ 0.046). The PRTs were 4.08 ± 0.77-29.86 ± 0.65 Ncm for method A, 4.04 ± 0.40-29.60 ± 0.36 Ncm for method B, and 2.98 ± 0.26-26.38 ± 0.59 Ncm for method C, and the PRTs of methods A and B were 11.77%-44.87% higher than that of method C ( ≤ 0.016). The removal torque loss rates of methods A (12.49% ± 0.99%-65.88% ± 4.83%) and B (12.84% ± 0.96%-65.35% ± 1.95%) were 3.04%-7.74% lower than that of method C (16.58% ± 0.56%-71.10% ± 1.58%) ( ≤ 0.017). The operating time of method A was much longer than those of methods B and C ( < 0.001). The structural integrity disruption of the screw thread was observed according to the SEM results in all postloading groups.
Method B (torquing and then loosening and immediate retorquing) increases the screw joint immediate stability by 6.28%-21.58% and the long-term stability by 11.77%-44.87% compared with method C (torquing only once), has comparable screw joint stability compared with method A (retorquing after 10 min), saves time and is recommended in clinical settings.
评估拧紧方法对牙种植体螺钉连接即刻稳定性和长期稳定性的影响。本研究共使用了三种不同直径的150颗种植体,分属三种不同的种植系统。根据拧紧方法,每组又分为三个亚组(每组 = 5):A组——以推荐扭矩拧紧,10分钟后再次拧紧;B组——以推荐扭矩拧紧,然后松开并立即再次拧紧;C组——仅以推荐扭矩拧紧一次。记录拧紧组件的操作时间。10分钟后,测量即刻拆除扭矩(IRT)(N·cm)。再次拧紧组件后,施加20至200 N的动态载荷,持续10个循环,然后测量加载后拆除扭矩(PRT)(N·cm)。使用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)观察螺钉的表面形貌。
对于不同类型的种植体,A组的IRT为11.92±1.04 - 34.12±0.36 N·cm,B组为11.64±0.57 - 33.96±0.29 N·cm,C组为10.30±0.41 - 31.62±0.52 N·cm,A组和B组的IRT比C组高6.28% - 21.58%(P≤0.046)。A组的PRT为4.08±0.77 - 29.86±0.65 N·cm,B组为4.04±0.40 - 29.60±0.36 N·cm,C组为2.98±0.26 - 26.38±0.59 N·cm,A组和B组的PRT比C组高11.77% - 44.87%(P≤0.016)。A组(12.49%±0.99% - 65.88%±4.83%)和B组(12.84%±0.96% - 65.35%±1.95%)的拆除扭矩损失率比C组(16.58%±0.56% - 71.10%±1.58%)低3.04% - 7.74%(P≤0.017)。A组的操作时间比B组和C组长得多(P<0.001)。根据SEM结果,在所有加载后组中均观察到螺纹结构完整性的破坏。
与仅拧紧一次的C组相比,B组(先拧紧然后松开并立即再次拧紧)可使螺钉连接的即刻稳定性提高6.28% - 21.58%,长期稳定性提高11.77% - 44.87%;与10分钟后再次拧紧的A组相比,B组的螺钉连接稳定性相当,且节省时间,推荐在临床中使用。