Spengos Konstantinos, Tsivgoulis Georgios, Zakopoulos Nikolaos
Department of Neurology, University of Athens School of Medicine, Eginition Hospital, Greece.
Eur Neurol. 2006;55(3):123-35. doi: 10.1159/000093212. Epub 2006 May 8.
Although elevated blood pressure (BP) levels are a common complication of acute stroke, whether of ischaemic or haemorrhagic type, a long-standing debate exists regarding the management of post-stroke hypertension. In the absence of solid, randomised data from controlled trials, the current observational evidence allows different approaches, since theoretical arguments exist for both lowering BP in the setting of acute stroke (reduce the risk of stroke recurrence, of subsequent oedema formation, of rebleeding and haematoma expansion in patients with cerebral bleeding) as well as leaving raised BP levels untreated (avoid reduction in cerebral perfusion pressure and blood flow to viable ischaemic tissue in the absence of normal autoregulation). The present review will summarize the evidence for and against the therapeutic manipulation of BP in acute stroke provided by the currently available observational studies and randomised trials, consider the ongoing clinical trials in this area and address the present recommendations regarding this conflicting issue.
尽管血压(BP)升高是急性中风的常见并发症,无论是缺血性还是出血性中风,关于中风后高血压的管理一直存在争论。由于缺乏来自对照试验的可靠随机数据,目前的观察性证据允许采用不同的方法,因为对于急性中风时降低血压(降低中风复发风险、随后的水肿形成风险、脑出血患者的再出血和血肿扩大风险)以及不治疗血压升高(在缺乏正常自动调节的情况下避免降低脑灌注压和流向存活缺血组织的血流量)都存在理论依据。本综述将总结目前可用的观察性研究和随机试验提供的支持和反对急性中风时对血压进行治疗性干预的证据,考虑该领域正在进行的临床试验,并探讨关于这个有争议问题的当前建议。