Davis Bruce H, Olsen Stephen H, Ahmad Ejaz, Bigelow Nancy C
Trillium Diagnostics, LLC, Maine Medical Center Research Institute, Scarborough, ME, USA.
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2006 May;130(5):654-61. doi: 10.5858/2006-130-654-NCIAII.
Sepsis, affecting millions of individuals annually with an associated high mortality rate, is among the top 10 causes of death. In addition, improvements in diagnostic tests for detecting and monitoring sepsis and infection have been limited in the last 25 years. Neutrophil CD64 expression has been proposed as an improved diagnostic test for the evaluation of infection and sepsis.
To evaluate the diagnostic performance of a quantitative flow cytometric assay for leukocyte CD64 expression in comparison with the standard tests for infection/sepsis in an ambulatory care setting.
Prospective analysis of 100 blood samples from patients from an emergency department setting in a 965-bed tertiary care suburban community hospital was performed for neutrophil CD64 expression, C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and complete blood count. The laboratory findings were compared with a clinical score for the likelihood of infection/sepsis, which was obtained by a blinded retrospective chart review.
The diagnostic performance, as gauged by the clinical score, varied with neutrophil CD64 (sensitivity 87.9%, specificity 71.2%, efficiency 76.8%) and outperformed C-reactive protein (sensitivity 88.2%, specificity 59.4%, efficiency 69.4%), absolute neutrophil count (sensitivity 60.0%, specificity 50.8%, efficiency 53.8%), myeloid left shift (sensitivity 68.2%, specificity 76.3%, efficiency 73.3%), and sedimentation rate (sensitivity 50.0%, specificity 65.5%, efficiency 61.0%).
Neutrophil CD64 expression quantitation provides improved diagnostic detection of infection/sepsis compared with the standard diagnostic tests used in current medical practice.
脓毒症每年影响数百万人,死亡率很高,是全球十大死因之一。此外,在过去25年中,用于检测和监测脓毒症及感染的诊断测试进展有限。中性粒细胞CD64表达已被提议作为评估感染和脓毒症的一种改进诊断测试。
在门诊护理环境中,评估白细胞CD64表达定量流式细胞术检测法与感染/脓毒症标准检测法相比的诊断性能。
对一家拥有965张床位的郊区三级护理社区医院急诊科100例患者的血样进行前瞻性分析,检测中性粒细胞CD64表达、C反应蛋白、红细胞沉降率和全血细胞计数。将实验室检查结果与通过盲法回顾性病历审查得出的感染/脓毒症可能性临床评分进行比较。
以临床评分为衡量标准,中性粒细胞CD64的诊断性能(敏感性87.9%,特异性71.2%,效率76.8%)优于C反应蛋白(敏感性88.2%,特异性59.4%,效率69.4%)、绝对中性粒细胞计数(敏感性60.0%,特异性50.8%,效率53.8%)、髓系左移(敏感性68.2%,特异性76.3%,效率73.3%)和沉降率(敏感性50.0%,特异性65.5%,效率61.0%)。
与目前医学实践中使用的标准诊断测试相比,中性粒细胞CD64表达定量检测能更好地诊断感染/脓毒症。