Suppr超能文献

中性粒细胞 CD64 表达与白细胞介素-6 和 C 反应蛋白在新生儿败血症早期诊断中的预测价值。

Predictive values of neutrophil CD64 expression compared with interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein in early diagnosis of neonatal sepsis.

机构信息

Department of Neonatology, Zekai Tahir Burak Maternity Teaching and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

J Clin Lab Anal. 2010;24(6):363-70. doi: 10.1002/jcla.20370.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite major advances in the management of newborn infants, neonatal sepsis (NS) remain important causes of neonatal morbidity and mortality in the newborn, mainly among preterm and low birth weight infants.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the usefulness of neutrophil CD64 expression alone and together with other infection markers in NS.

METHODS

Peripheral blood samples were taken from 109 neonates, who were categorized into three groups: proven or clinical sepsis (n=35); disease without infection (n=42); and healthy controls (n=32). Complete blood count with differential, interleukin-6 (IL-6), C-reactive protein (CRP), and cell surface expression of CD64 on neutrophils have been evaluated in a prospective manner as a diagnostic aid for NS.

RESULTS

Expression of CD64 was significantly enhanced in neonates with sepsis compared with newborns with disease without infection and healthy controls (P=0.001 and P=0.001, respectively). Cutoff values of IL-6, CRP, CD64(MFI), and CD64(i) were 24.9  pg/ml, 4.05  mg/l, 87.7, and 4.39, respectively. Sensitivity-negative predictive values of IL-6, CRP, and CD64(MFI)/CD64(i) were 80.0-90.6%, 80.0-88.8%, and 88.6-94.0%, respectively. Combining all three tests increased the sensitivity to 100%; however, specificity and positive predictive value decreased to 62.1 and 55.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

CD64 might be used either alone or combined with IL-6 and CRP for early diagnosis of NS. The advantages of CD64 when compared with IL-6 and CRP are rapid quantitation, very small blood volume required, and easy handling.

摘要

背景

尽管新生儿管理取得了重大进展,但新生儿败血症(NS)仍然是新生儿发病率和死亡率的重要原因,主要发生在早产儿和低出生体重儿中。

目的

本研究旨在探讨中性粒细胞 CD64 表达单独及与其他感染标志物联合在 NS 中的应用价值。

方法

前瞻性采集 109 例新生儿外周血样本,分为三组:确诊或临床败血症(n=35);无感染疾病(n=42);健康对照组(n=32)。通过全血细胞计数、白细胞介素 6(IL-6)、C 反应蛋白(CRP)和中性粒细胞表面 CD64 表达,评估其作为 NS 诊断辅助的诊断价值。

结果

与无感染疾病的新生儿和健康对照组相比,败血症新生儿的 CD64 表达明显增强(P=0.001 和 P=0.001)。IL-6、CRP、CD64(MFI)和 CD64(i)的截断值分别为 24.9pg/ml、4.05mg/l、87.7 和 4.39。IL-6、CRP 和 CD64(MFI)/CD64(i)的阴性预测值分别为 80.0-90.6%、80.0-88.8%和 88.6-94.0%。三种检测方法联合应用可将灵敏度提高至 100%,但特异性和阳性预测值分别降低至 62.1%和 55.5%。

结论

CD64 可单独或与 IL-6 和 CRP 联合用于早期诊断 NS。与 IL-6 和 CRP 相比,CD64 的优势在于快速定量、所需血量少且易于操作。

相似文献

4
Expression of CD64 as a potential marker of neonatal sepsis.CD64作为新生儿败血症潜在标志物的表达
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2002 Oct;13(5):319-27. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-3038.2002.01064.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnosis of Neonatal Sepsis: The Role of Inflammatory Markers.新生儿败血症的诊断:炎症标志物的作用
Front Pediatr. 2022 Mar 8;10:840288. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.840288. eCollection 2022.
2
Diagnosis of neonatal sepsis: the past, present and future.新生儿败血症的诊断:过去、现在和未来。
Pediatr Res. 2022 Jan;91(2):337-350. doi: 10.1038/s41390-021-01696-z. Epub 2021 Nov 2.

本文引用的文献

10
Definitions of bloodstream infection in the newborn.新生儿血流感染的定义。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2005 May;6(3 Suppl):S45-9. doi: 10.1097/01.PCC.0000161946.73305.0A.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验