Suppr超能文献

当前对女性血管性血友病的认识——一些答案,更多问题。

Current understanding of von Willebrand's disease in women - some answers, more questions.

作者信息

Kouides P A

机构信息

Mary M. Gooley Hemophilia Treatment Center, Rochester, NY 14621, USA.

出版信息

Haemophilia. 2006 Jul;12 Suppl 3:143-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2006.01272.x.

Abstract

Considerable progress has been made in the past decade in describing the obstetrical and gynaecological aspects of von Willebrand's disease (VWD). In addition, epidemiological studies have established an approximately 11-16% prevalence of the laboratory diagnosis of VWD in women presenting with menorrhagia. However, it is not established presently whether an upfront VWD screening should be a part of the standard evaluation of menorrhagia. This is because it is presently not known whether therapy in the VWD patient tailored specifically for VWD will appreciably alter the natural history of menorrhagia compared with the non-VWD menorrhagia patient. There are also subtleties involved in securing the diagnosis of VWD in women presenting with menorrhagia in terms of fluctuation of von Willebrand factor (VWF) levels vis-à-vis the menstrual cycle and the potential impact of oral contraceptive on VWF levels. Regarding management of VWD-related menorrhagia, pending ongoing comparative trials of intranasal desmopressin (DDAVP), tranexamic acid, oral contraceptive and the levonorgestrel intrauterine device, specific recommendations cannot be made presently regarding the superiority of one intervention compared with the other. The management of VWD-related postpartum haemorrhage is also an area of active debate in terms of 'best practice' in type 1 (? prophylactic DDAVP), type 2 [? expectant management if factor VIII:C (FVIII:C) level normalizes] and type 3 patients (? intensity and duration of infusional therapy with a VWF-containing plasma-derived FVIII concentrate). This review summarizes the present state of knowledge and highlights numerous questions for future study based on our present understanding of VWD in women.

摘要

在过去十年中,在描述血管性血友病(VWD)的妇产科方面已取得了相当大的进展。此外,流行病学研究已确定,在月经过多的女性中,VWD实验室诊断的患病率约为11%-16%。然而,目前尚不确定预先进行VWD筛查是否应成为月经过多标准评估的一部分。这是因为目前尚不清楚专门针对VWD的VWD患者治疗与非VWD月经过多患者相比,是否会明显改变月经过多的自然病程。在诊断月经过多的女性中的VWD时,还存在一些微妙之处,涉及血管性血友病因子(VWF)水平相对于月经周期的波动以及口服避孕药对VWF水平的潜在影响。关于VWD相关性月经过多的管理,在鼻内去氨加压素(DDAVP)、氨甲环酸、口服避孕药和左炔诺孕酮宫内节育器的正在进行的比较试验完成之前,目前无法就一种干预措施相对于另一种干预措施的优越性提出具体建议。在1型(?预防性DDAVP)、2型[?如果因子VIII:C(FVIII:C)水平恢复正常则进行期待管理]和3型患者(?含VWF的血浆源性FVIII浓缩物输注治疗的强度和持续时间)的“最佳实践”方面,VWD相关性产后出血的管理也是一个积极辩论的领域。本综述总结了当前的知识状态,并根据我们目前对女性VWD的理解,突出了许多未来研究的问题。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验