Approaches to extrapolating animal toxicity data on organic solvents to public health.

Synthesizing information about the acute neurotoxicity of organic solvents into predictive relationships between exposure and effect in humans is difficult because (1) data are usually derived from experimental animals whose sensitivity to the chemical relative to humans is unknown; (2) the specific endpoints measured in laboratory animals seldom translate into effects of concern in humans; and (3) the mode of action of the chemical is rarely understood. We sought to develop approaches to estimate the hazard and cost of exposure to organic solvents, focusing on the acute behavioral effects of toluene in rats and humans. Available published data include studies of shock avoidance behavior in rats and choice reaction time in humans. A meta-analysis of these data suggested that a 10% change in rat avoidance behavior occurs at a blood concentration of toluene 25 times higher than the concentration at which a 10% change in human choice reaction time occurs. In contrast, our in vitro studies of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors indicated that human and rat receptors do not differ in sensitivity to toluene. Analysis of other dose-response relationships for visual and cognitive functions in rats suggests that the apparent difference between rats and humans may be driven by the specific endpoints measured in the two species rather than by inherent differences in sensitivity to toluene. We also explored the hypothesis that dose-equivalence relationships may be used to compare the societal costs of two chemicals. For example, ethanol-induced changes in choice reaction time, for which societal costs are estimatable, may be used as a benchmark effect for estimating the monetary benefits of controlling exposure to organic solvents. This dose-equivalence method is applicable for solvents because this set of data fulfills three important assumptions about equivalence relationships based on a single effect: (1) a common dose metric (concentration of the chemical in the brain); (2) a common effect to provide a linking variable (choice reaction time); and (3) a common mode of action (interference with neuronal ion channel function).