Kaf Wafaa A, Durrant John D, Sabo Diane L, Robert Boston J, Taubman Lisa B, Kovacyk Kristie
Department of Communication Science and Disorders, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA.
Int J Audiol. 2006 Apr;45(4):211-23. doi: 10.1080/14992020500377907.
The validity and accuracy of the application of the auditory steady-state response (ASSR) to electric response audiometry (ERA) was tested further in a study permitting subjects to be their own controls for hearing loss. Simulated sensorineural hearing loss (SSHL) of complex configuration and varying degrees was effected using filtered masking noise. Thresholds estimated via ASSR-ERA were compared to those measured via conventional pure-tone audiometry. Further, the slow vertex potential N1-P2 was recorded to permit a comparison with an evoked-response test of common content validity and known accuracy. Results in a homogeneous subject sample demonstrated strong interest correlation and agreement within 10 dB at 1000 to 4000 Hz (on average), but not at 500 Hz. The configurations determined by ASSR-ERA followed behavioral audiometric patterns well, except for the mildest degree of SSHL tested. Consequently, limitations of ERA remain, although ASSR-ERA appears to be quite valid overall and promises (justifiably) broad clinical applicability.
在一项允许受试者自身作为听力损失对照的研究中,进一步测试了听觉稳态反应(ASSR)应用于电反应测听法(ERA)的有效性和准确性。使用滤波掩蔽噪声模拟了复杂构型和不同程度的感音神经性听力损失(SSHL)。将通过ASSR-ERA估计的阈值与通过传统纯音听力测定法测得的阈值进行比较。此外,记录了慢顶点电位N1-P2,以便与具有共同内容效度和已知准确性的诱发反应测试进行比较。在同质受试者样本中的结果表明,在1000至4000Hz(平均)时,相关性很强且在10dB范围内一致,但在500Hz时并非如此。除了测试的最轻度SSHL外,ASSR-ERA确定的构型与行为听力测定模式吻合良好。因此,ERA仍然存在局限性,尽管ASSR-ERA总体上似乎相当有效,并有望(合理地)广泛应用于临床。