Swanepoel De Wet, Ebrahim Shamim, Friedland Peter, Swanepoel Andre, Pottas Lidia
Department of Communication Pathology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0002, South Africa.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2008 Dec;72(12):1861-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2008.09.017. Epub 2008 Oct 28.
The auditory steady-state response (ASSR) to air-conduction (AC) stimuli has been widely incorporated into audiological test-batteries for the pediatric population. The current understanding of ASSR to bone conduction (BC) stimuli, however, is more limited, especially in the case of infants and children. There are few reports on ASSR thresholds to BC stimuli in infants and young children, and none for infants or children with hearing loss. The objective of this study was to investigate BC ASSR thresholds in young children with normal hearing and various types and degrees of hearing loss.
AC and BC ASSR thresholds are reported for 48 young children (mean age+/-SD=2.8+/-1.9 years; age range=0.25-11.5 years; 23 female). Hearing status was classified by assessing all children with a comprehensive test battery including tympanometry, diagnostic distortion-product otoacoustic emissions, click-evoked AC auditory brainstem response, AC and BC ASSR thresholds, and an otologic examination. The subjects were assigned to the categories normal hearing, conductive loss, and sensorineural loss (mild-to-moderate or severe-to-profound), for group analysis. AC and BC ASSR stimuli (carrier frequencies: 0.25-4 kHz; 67-95 Hz modulation rates; 100% amplitude and 10% frequency modulated) were presented using the GSI Audera system.
Minimum levels at which spurious BC ASSR occur were established in the group of children with severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss (25, 40, 60, 60 and 60 dB for 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz, respectively). Children with normal hearing presented mean (1 SD) BC ASSR thresholds of 19 (9), 18 (7), 16 (11), 24 (7), and 26 (8) dB HL at 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz, respectively. Significantly lower thresholds (p<0.0001) were obtained for 0.25, 0.5 and 1 kHz than for 2 and 4 kHz. At 0.25 kHz, 39% of thresholds were at the minimum level of spurious response occurrence. More than half (54%) of the BC thresholds in the group with mild-to-moderate sensorineural hearing loss were recorded at or above the minimum levels at which spurious response occurred. In children with conductive hearing loss, the average BC ASSR thresholds corresponded closely to those in the normal hearing group except at 1 kHz and revealed an air-bone gap.
Spurious bone conduction ASSR responses limit the intensity range for which the technique may be employed in infants and children, especially at lower frequencies. Consequently, the 0.25 kHz stimulus is not recommended for clinical use. In infants and young children, sensorineural hearing loss of a moderate or greater degree in the high frequencies (1-4 kHz), and of a mild or greater degree in the low frequencies (0.5 kHz), cannot be quantified using BC ASSR. This is due to the presence of the stimulus artifact. In cases of conductive hearing loss, BC ASSR can effectively quantify sensory hearing between 0.5 and 4 kHz, but interpretations must be made cautiously within the limitations of stimulus artifact occurrence across frequencies.
气导(AC)刺激的听觉稳态反应(ASSR)已广泛应用于儿科听力测试组合中。然而,目前对于骨导(BC)刺激的ASSR的了解较为有限,尤其是在婴幼儿中。关于婴幼儿BC刺激的ASSR阈值的报道很少,对于听力损失的婴幼儿则尚无相关报道。本研究的目的是调查听力正常以及患有各种类型和程度听力损失的幼儿的BC ASSR阈值。
报告了48名幼儿(平均年龄±标准差=2.8±1.9岁;年龄范围=0.25 - 11.5岁;23名女性)的AC和BC ASSR阈值。通过使用包括鼓室图、诊断性畸变产物耳声发射、短声诱发的AC听觉脑干反应、AC和BC ASSR阈值以及耳科检查在内的综合测试组合对所有儿童进行评估,从而对听力状况进行分类。将受试者分为听力正常、传导性听力损失和感音神经性听力损失(轻度至中度或重度至极重度)类别进行组间分析。使用GSI Audera系统呈现AC和BC ASSR刺激(载波频率:0.25 - 4 kHz;调制率:67 - 95 Hz;幅度调制100%,频率调制10%)。
在重度至极重度感音神经性听力损失儿童组中确定了出现伪BC ASSR的最低水平(0.25、0.5、1、2和4 kHz分别为25、40、60、60和60 dB)。听力正常的儿童在0.25、0.5、1、2和4 kHz时的平均(±1标准差)BC ASSR阈值分别为19(9)、18(7)、16(11)、24(7)和26(8)dB HL。0.25、0.5和1 kHz时获得的阈值显著低于2和4 kHz时的阈值(p<0.0001)。在0.25 kHz时,39%的阈值处于伪反应出现的最低水平。轻度至中度感音神经性听力损失组中超过一半(54%)的BC阈值记录在伪反应出现的最低水平或以上。在传导性听力损失儿童中,除1 kHz外,平均BC ASSR阈值与听力正常组的阈值密切对应,并显示出气骨导间距。
伪骨导ASSR反应限制了该技术在婴幼儿中可采用的强度范围,尤其是在较低频率时。因此,不建议将0.25 kHz刺激用于临床。在婴幼儿中,高频(1 - 4 kHz)中度或更重度以及低频(0.5 kHz)轻度或更重度的感音神经性听力损失无法使用BC ASSR进行量化。这是由于刺激伪迹的存在。在传导性听力损失的情况下,BC ASSR可以有效地量化0.5至4 kHz之间的感觉性听力,但必须在各频率出现刺激伪迹的限制范围内谨慎进行解读。