• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于纵向电子健康记录可持续性的全球社会经济 - 医学 - 法律模型。第1部分。

A global socio-economic-medico-legal model for the sustainability of longitudinal electronic health records. Part 1.

作者信息

Shabo A

机构信息

IBM Research Lab, Haifa 31905, Israel.

出版信息

Methods Inf Med. 2006;45(3):240-5.

PMID:16685331
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This paper pursues the challenge of sustaining lifetime electronic health records (EHRs) based on a comprehensive socio-economic-medico-legal model. The notion of a lifetime EHR extends the emerging concept of a longitudinal and cross-institutional EHR and is invaluable information for increasing patient safety and quality of care.

METHODS

The challenge is how to compile and sustain a coherent EHR across the lifetime of an individual. Several existing and hypothetical models are described, analyzed and compared in an attempt to suggest a preferred approach.

RESULTS

The vision is that lifetime EHRs should be sustained by new players in the healthcare arena, who will function as independent health record banks (IHRBs). Multiple competing IHRBs would be established and regulated following preemptive legislation. They should be neither owned by healthcare providers nor by health insurer/payers or government agencies. The new legislation should also stipulate that the records located in these banks be considered the medico-legal copies of an individual's records, and that healthcare providers no longer serve as the legal record keepers.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed model is not centered on any of the current players in the field; instead, it is focussed on the objective service of sustaining individual EHRs, much like financial banks maintain and manage financial assets. This revolutionary structure provides two main benefits: 1) Healthcare organizations will be able to cut the costs of long-term record keeping, and 2) healthcare providers will be able to provide better care based on the availability of a lifelong EHR of their new patients.

摘要

目标

本文基于一个全面的社会经济 - 医学 - 法律模型,应对维持终身电子健康记录(EHR)这一挑战。终身电子健康记录的概念扩展了新兴的纵向和跨机构电子健康记录概念,对于提高患者安全和护理质量而言是极为宝贵的信息。

方法

挑战在于如何在个人的一生中编制并维持连贯的电子健康记录。描述、分析并比较了几种现有的和假设的模型,试图提出一种更优的方法。

结果

设想是终身电子健康记录应由医疗保健领域的新参与者来维持,这些参与者将充当独立的健康记录库(IHRB)。在预先制定的立法之后,将建立并监管多个相互竞争的独立健康记录库。它们既不应由医疗保健提供者拥有,也不应由健康保险公司/付款方或政府机构拥有。新立法还应规定,这些库中的记录应被视为个人记录的医学 - 法律副本,并且医疗保健提供者不再担任法律记录保管者。

结论

所提议的模型并非以该领域当前的任何参与者为中心;相反,它专注于维持个人电子健康记录的客观服务,很像金融银行维护和管理金融资产。这种革命性的结构带来两个主要益处:1)医疗保健组织将能够削减长期记录保存的成本,以及2)医疗保健提供者将能够基于新患者的终身电子健康记录的可用性提供更好的护理。

相似文献

1
A global socio-economic-medico-legal model for the sustainability of longitudinal electronic health records. Part 1.用于纵向电子健康记录可持续性的全球社会经济 - 医学 - 法律模型。第1部分。
Methods Inf Med. 2006;45(3):240-5.
2
A global socio-economic-medico-legal model for the sustainability of longitudinal electronic health records - part 2.纵向电子健康记录可持续性的全球社会经济 - 医学 - 法律模型 - 第2部分。
Methods Inf Med. 2006;45(5):498-505.
3
Independent health record banks for older people--the ultimate integration of dispersed and disparate medical records.老年人独立健康记录库——分散且不同的医疗记录的最终整合。
Inform Health Soc Care. 2010 Sep-Dec;35(3-4):188-99. doi: 10.3109/17538157.2010.528635.
4
Advanced and secure architectural EHR approaches.先进且安全的架构式电子健康记录方法。
Int J Med Inform. 2006 Mar-Apr;75(3-4):185-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.07.017. Epub 2005 Aug 19.
5
Electronic health records: international, structural and legal perspectives.电子健康记录:国际、结构及法律视角
J Law Med. 2004 Aug;12(1):26-39.
6
Relationship between use of electronic health record features and health care quality: results of a statewide survey.电子健康记录功能的使用与医疗质量之间的关系:全州范围调查的结果。
Med Care. 2010 Mar;48(3):203-9. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181c16203.
7
A study of user requests regarding the fully electronic health record system at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital: challenges for future electronic health record systems.一项关于首尔国立大学盆唐医院全电子健康记录系统用户请求的研究:对未来电子健康记录系统的挑战。
Int J Med Inform. 2013 May;82(5):387-97. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.08.004. Epub 2012 Sep 7.
8
Ontology-based framework for electronic health records interoperability.基于本体的电子健康记录互操作性框架。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2011;169:694-8.
9
Why a shared care record is an official medical record.为何共享护理记录是一份官方医疗记录。
N Z Med J. 2013 Oct 18;126(1384):109-17.
10
Designing a system for patients controlling providers' access to their electronic health records: organizational and technical challenges.设计一个患者控制医疗服务提供者访问其电子健康记录的系统:组织和技术挑战。
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Jan;30 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S17-24. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-3055-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Citation analysis of the prognosis of Haux et al. for the year 2013.豪克斯等人2013年预后情况的引文分析。
J Med Syst. 2014 Jul;38(7):71. doi: 10.1007/s10916-014-0071-8.
2
A conceptual framework and principles for trusted pervasive health.可信泛在健康的概念框架与原则
J Med Internet Res. 2012 Apr 6;14(2):e52. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1972.
3
Integrated personal health records: transformative tools for consumer-centric care.整合个人健康记录:以消费者为中心的护理变革工具。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2008 Oct 6;8:45. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-8-45.