Zantut L F, Zantut P E, Rodrigues Júnior A J, Birolini D
Dep. de Cir., Fac. de Med., Univ. de São Paulo.
AMB Rev Assoc Med Bras. 1991 Jul-Sep;37(3):143-9.
Patients with traumatic or non-traumatic acute abdomen, often exhibit difficulties in the assessment of the real intra-abdominal visceral compromise. This study intends to compare laparoscopy and ultrasonography in patients with non-traumatic or traumatic acute abdomen, in whom there is a doubt on the actual visceral compromise. Forty-five patients were studied in this protocol. Both procedures were performed in 28 and in 17 patients with non-traumatic or traumatic acute abdomen, respectively. The laparoscopic examination was shown to be superior to the ultrasound even when one subtracts from the ultrasound data all pathologies that involved bowel transit and the bowel wall such as the acute appendicitis and cases of pelvic inflammatory disease. The laparoscopic and ultrasound accuracy were 97.8% and 53%, respectively.
患有创伤性或非创伤性急腹症的患者,在评估真正的腹腔内脏器损伤时常常存在困难。本研究旨在比较腹腔镜检查与超声检查在非创伤性或创伤性急腹症患者中的应用,这些患者对实际的脏器损伤存在疑问。本研究方案纳入了45例患者。分别对28例非创伤性急腹症患者和17例创伤性急腹症患者进行了这两种检查。即使从超声数据中减去所有涉及肠道转运和肠壁的病变,如急性阑尾炎和盆腔炎病例,腹腔镜检查仍显示优于超声检查。腹腔镜检查和超声检查的准确率分别为97.8%和53%。