• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从鹰派和鸽派到具有自我一致性的领土行为博弈。

From hawks and doves to self-consistent games of territorial behavior.

机构信息

Laboratory of Ecological and Evolutionary Dynamics, Department of Biological and Environmental Science, University of Helsinki, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

Am Nat. 2006 Jun;167(6):901-12. doi: 10.1086/504604. Epub 2006 May 10.

DOI:10.1086/504604
PMID:16685641
Abstract

Explaining the "prior-residence effect" (automatic owner status of individuals who arrived first in an area) was one of the very first applications of game theory in animal behavior. These models, however, predict paradoxical solutions where intruders always win, with no satisfactory explanation for the absence of such cases in nature. We propose a solution based on new developments in evolutionary game theory. A self-consistent model with feedbacks between individual behavior and population dynamics produces qualitatively different frequency-dependent selection on intruders (floaters) than on territory owners. Starting with an ancestral population with no respect for ownership, the most likely evolutionary end point is complete or partial respect. Conventional rules of conflict resolution thus can rely on "uncorrelated asymmetries" without differences in resource-holding power or territory value, although they will be strengthened by such differences. We also review the empirical literature on animal contests, testing whether asymmetries in resource-holding power are required to explain the observations. Despite much empirical effort, results remain inconclusive, because experiments are often unable to distinguish between the motivation of individuals to fight and the behavioral outcome of a contest. To help arrive at conclusive answers, we suggest a standardized empirical approach to quantify prior-residence effects.

摘要

解释“先占效应”(先到达一个地区的个人自动拥有该地区的所有者身份)是博弈论在动物行为学中的最早应用之一。然而,这些模型预测了入侵者总是获胜的矛盾解决方案,对于自然界中不存在这种情况,没有令人满意的解释。我们提出了一个基于进化博弈论新发展的解决方案。一个具有个体行为和种群动态之间反馈的自洽模型,对入侵者(漂游者)产生了与领地所有者不同的定性的、依赖频率的选择。从一个没有尊重所有权的祖先种群开始,最有可能的进化终点是完全或部分尊重。因此,传统的冲突解决规则可以依赖于“不相关的不对称性”,而不考虑资源持有能力或领地价值的差异,尽管这些差异会加强这种不对称性。我们还回顾了关于动物竞争的实证文献,检验了是否需要资源持有能力的不对称性来解释观察结果。尽管进行了大量的实证研究,但结果仍不确定,因为实验往往无法区分个体战斗的动机和竞争的行为结果。为了帮助得出明确的答案,我们建议采用一种标准化的经验方法来量化先占效应。

相似文献

1
From hawks and doves to self-consistent games of territorial behavior.从鹰派和鸽派到具有自我一致性的领土行为博弈。
Am Nat. 2006 Jun;167(6):901-12. doi: 10.1086/504604. Epub 2006 May 10.
2
How residency duration affects the outcome of a territorial contest: Complementary game-theoretic models.住院医师培训时长如何影响区域竞争的结果:互补博弈论模型
J Theor Biol. 2016 Apr 7;394:137-148. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2016.01.016. Epub 2016 Jan 22.
3
Defence, intrusion and the evolutionary stability of territoriality.防御、入侵与领域性的进化稳定性
J Theor Biol. 2010 Oct 21;266(4):606-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.07.033. Epub 2010 Aug 3.
4
Multiple asymmetry and concord resolutions of a conflict.冲突的多重不对称与协调解决方式
J Theor Biol. 2001 Nov 21;213(2):209-22. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.2001.2412.
5
Territoriality evidenced by asymmetric intruder-holder motivation in an amblypygid.在一种鞭蛛中,由不对称的入侵者 - 占有者动机所证明的领地性。
Behav Processes. 2016 Jan;122:110-5. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2015.11.014. Epub 2015 Dec 2.
6
A general framework for analysing multiplayer games in networks using territorial interactions as a case study.使用领地相互作用作为案例研究,分析网络中多人游戏的通用框架。
J Theor Biol. 2012 Jun 7;302:70-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2012.02.025. Epub 2012 Mar 3.
7
Predictors of floater status in a long-lived bird: a cross-sectional and longitudinal test of hypotheses.一种长寿鸟类中浮游状态的预测因素:假设的横断面和纵向检验
J Anim Ecol. 2009 Jan;78(1):109-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01484.x.
8
Residency effects in animal contests.动物竞争中的居留效应。
Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Aug 22;271(1549):1707-11. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2775.
9
The evolution of respect for property.对财产尊重的演变。
J Evol Biol. 2015 Jun;28(6):1185-202. doi: 10.1111/jeb.12648. Epub 2015 May 8.
10
Territorial defense, territory size, and population regulation.领地防御、领地大小与种群调节
Am Nat. 2005 Sep;166(3):317-29. doi: 10.1086/432560. Epub 2005 Jul 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Strong wintering site fidelity contrasts with exploratory breeding site sampling in a socially monogamous shorebird.在一种实行社会一夫一妻制的滨鸟中,强烈的越冬地忠诚度与探索性的繁殖地取样形成对比。
Mov Ecol. 2025 Jul 11;13(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s40462-025-00580-3.
2
Tracking spatial patterns and daily modulation of behavior in a natural population of the pulse-type weakly electric fish, .追踪脉冲型弱电鱼自然种群中的行为空间模式和日常调节
iScience. 2025 Feb 13;28(3):112018. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.112018. eCollection 2025 Mar 21.
3
Inheritance of Material Wealth in a Natural Population.
自然种群中物质财富的遗传
Ecol Lett. 2024 Dec;27(12):e14505. doi: 10.1111/ele.14505.
4
Temporal and spatial variation in reproductive benefits in a partial migrant.部分迁徙动物繁殖益处的时空变化
Ecology. 2024 Dec;105(12):e4451. doi: 10.1002/ecy.4451. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
5
Prospecting during egg laying informs incubation recess movements of eastern wild turkeys.产蛋期间的勘探行为会影响东部野生火鸡孵化间歇期的活动。
Mov Ecol. 2024 Jan 17;12(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s40462-024-00451-3.
6
Modelling migration in birds: competition's role in maintaining individual variation.鸟类迁徙建模:竞争在维持个体变异中的作用。
Proc Biol Sci. 2021 Nov 10;288(1962):20210323. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2021.0323.
7
Costs of territoriality: a review of hypotheses, meta-analysis, and field study.领地成本:假说综述、荟萃分析与实地研究
Oecologia. 2021 Nov;197(3):615-631. doi: 10.1007/s00442-021-05068-6. Epub 2021 Oct 30.
8
Evolution of deterrence with costly reputation information.有代价声誉信息下的威慑力演变。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 15;16(6):e0253344. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253344. eCollection 2021.
9
Group dominance increases territory size and reduces neighbour pressure in wild chimpanzees.群体优势会增加野生黑猩猩的领地大小并减轻来自邻居的压力。
R Soc Open Sci. 2020 May 27;7(5):200577. doi: 10.1098/rsos.200577. eCollection 2020 May.
10
How migratory populations become resident.迁徙种群如何成为居留种群。
Proc Biol Sci. 2020 Mar 25;287(1923):20193011. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2019.3011. Epub 2020 Mar 18.