• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

精神性运动障碍临床诊断标准的评估

Evaluation of clinical diagnostic criteria for psychogenic movement disorders.

作者信息

Shill Holly, Gerber Paula

机构信息

Division of Movement Disorders, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.

出版信息

Mov Disord. 2006 Aug;21(8):1163-8. doi: 10.1002/mds.20921.

DOI:10.1002/mds.20921
PMID:16685685
Abstract

Previous studies showed that there are certain features suggestive of a psychogenic disorder, and Fahn and Williams proposed criteria for psychogenic movement disorders. Data on the sensitivity and specificity of these criteria are lacking. We expanded on the Fahn and Williams criteria to create a new set of diagnostic criteria. We retrospectively reviewed 79 patients in a movement disorders specialty clinic. We applied the proposed diagnostic criteria to both cases and controls and analyzed sensitivity and specificity. The diagnostic criteria correctly identified "clinically probable" (or better) psychogenic movement disorders with a sensitivity of 83% and specificity of 100%. For "clinically possible" or greater, sensitivity was 97% and specificity was 96%. In addition, a significantly higher proportion of patients with psychogenic disease were female and reported either a family history of neurological disease or other exposure to neurological disease (P = 0.001 and 0.01, respectively). The diagnostic criteria are simple to apply and have high sensitivity and specificity for psychogenic movement disorders. Also, we report a correlation between previous exposure to a disease model and psychogenic disease.

摘要

以往研究表明,存在某些提示精神性障碍的特征,法恩(Fahn)和威廉姆斯(Williams)提出了精神性运动障碍的诊断标准。但缺乏关于这些标准敏感性和特异性的数据。我们对法恩和威廉姆斯的标准进行扩展,制定了一套新的诊断标准。我们对一家运动障碍专科诊所的79例患者进行了回顾性研究。我们将所提出的诊断标准应用于病例组和对照组,并分析了敏感性和特异性。该诊断标准正确识别出“临床很可能”(或更可能)的精神性运动障碍,敏感性为83%,特异性为100%。对于“临床可能”或更高可能性的情况,敏感性为97%,特异性为96%。此外,精神性疾病患者中女性比例显著更高,且报告有神经疾病家族史或其他神经疾病接触史的比例也更高(P值分别为0.001和0.01)。该诊断标准易于应用,对精神性运动障碍具有高敏感性和特异性。此外,我们报告了既往接触疾病模型与精神性疾病之间的相关性。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of clinical diagnostic criteria for psychogenic movement disorders.精神性运动障碍临床诊断标准的评估
Mov Disord. 2006 Aug;21(8):1163-8. doi: 10.1002/mds.20921.
2
Phenomenology of psychogenic movement disorders in children.儿童心因性运动障碍的现象学。
Mov Disord. 2012 Aug;27(9):1153-7. doi: 10.1002/mds.24947. Epub 2012 Mar 7.
3
Psychogenic movement disorders.心因性运动障碍。
Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2012 Jan;18 Suppl 1:S155-7. doi: 10.1016/S1353-8020(11)70048-7.
4
Acupuncture for psychogenic movement disorders: treatment or diagnostic tool?针刺疗法治疗心因性运动障碍:是治疗手段还是诊断工具?
Mov Disord. 2007 Jul 15;22(9):1353-5. doi: 10.1002/mds.21467.
5
Clinical characteristics of 49 patients with psychogenic movement disorders in a tertiary clinic in Turkey.土耳其一家三级诊所中49例精神性运动障碍患者的临床特征。
Mov Disord. 2009 Apr 15;24(5):759-62. doi: 10.1002/mds.22114.
6
Psychogenic movement disorders.精神性运动障碍
Neurol Clin. 1995 May;13(2):283-97.
7
A refined symptom-based approach to diagnose pulmonary tuberculosis in children.一种基于症状的精细化方法用于诊断儿童肺结核。
Pediatrics. 2006 Nov;118(5):e1350-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-0519.
8
Reproducibility of a standardized quantitative analysis using fixed regions of interest to differentiate movement disorders on 123I-FP-CIT SPECT.使用固定感兴趣区域进行标准化定量分析以鉴别123I-FP-CIT单光子发射计算机断层扫描上运动障碍的可重复性。
J Nucl Med Technol. 2007 Mar;35(1):21-6.
9
The "chair test" to aid in the diagnosis of psychogenic gait disorders.用于辅助诊断心因性步态障碍的“椅子试验”。
Neurologist. 2007 Mar;13(2):87-91. doi: 10.1097/01.nrl.0000256358.52613.cc.
10
Opinions and clinical practices related to diagnosing and managing patients with psychogenic movement disorders: An international survey of movement disorder society members.关于精神性运动障碍患者诊断与管理的观点及临床实践:一项针对运动障碍协会成员的国际调查
Mov Disord. 2009 Jul 15;24(9):1366-74. doi: 10.1002/mds.22618.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding Functional Neurological Disorder: Recent Insights and Diagnostic Challenges.理解功能性神经障碍:最新见解与诊断挑战
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Apr 18;25(8):4470. doi: 10.3390/ijms25084470.
2
Functional Tic-Like Behaviors: A Common Comorbidity in Patients with Tourette Syndrome.功能性抽动样行为:抽动秽语综合征患者的常见共病情况。
Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2024 Mar;11(3):227-237. doi: 10.1002/mdc3.13932. Epub 2023 Dec 12.
3
Electrophysiology in Functional Movement Disorders: An Update.功能性运动障碍中的电生理学:最新进展。
Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y). 2023 Dec 26;13:49. doi: 10.5334/tohm.793. eCollection 2023.
4
Healthcare employment as a risk factor for functional neurological disorder: A case-control study.医疗保健就业作为功能性神经障碍的一个风险因素:一项病例对照研究。
Eur J Neurol. 2024 Jan;31(1):e16056. doi: 10.1111/ene.16056. Epub 2023 Sep 11.
5
Dysfunctional Networks in Functional Dystonia.功能性肌张力障碍中的功能障碍网络。
Adv Neurobiol. 2023;31:157-176. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-26220-3_9.
6
Focal Dystonia and the Stress Network: The Role of Stress Vulnerability and Adverse Childhood Experiences in the Development of Musician's Dystonia.局限性肌张力障碍与应激网络:应激易感性和儿童期逆境经历在音乐家肌张力障碍发病中的作用。
Adv Neurobiol. 2023;31:23-44. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-26220-3_2.
7
Tics and TikTok: Functional Tics Spread Through Social Media.抽动与抖音:功能性抽动通过社交媒体传播。
Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2021 Jul 1;8(8):1248-1252. doi: 10.1002/mdc3.13267. eCollection 2021 Nov.
8
Functional Dystonia: Differentiation From Primary Dystonia and Multidisciplinary Treatments.功能性肌张力障碍:与原发性肌张力障碍的鉴别及多学科治疗
Front Neurol. 2021 Feb 4;11:605262. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.605262. eCollection 2020.
9
Functional or not functional; that's the question: Can we predict the diagnosis functional movement disorder based on associated features?功能性还是非功能性;这是问题所在:我们能否根据相关特征预测功能性运动障碍的诊断?
Eur J Neurol. 2021 Jan;28(1):33-39. doi: 10.1111/ene.14488. Epub 2020 Sep 20.
10
Clinical Characteristics of Functional Movement Disorders in the Stomatognathic System.口颌系统功能性运动障碍的临床特征
Front Neurol. 2020 Mar 13;11:123. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00123. eCollection 2020.