• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

CABG or PCI: which is better? Bypass or angioplasty with stent? For multivessel disease, some say surgery is the superior treatment.

出版信息

Health News. 2006 May;12(5):8-10.

PMID:16685751
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
CABG or PCI: which is better? Bypass or angioplasty with stent? For multivessel disease, some say surgery is the superior treatment.冠状动脉搭桥术（CABG）还是经皮冠状动脉介入治疗（PCI）：哪种更好？搭桥还是支架血管成形术？对于多支血管病变，有人认为手术是更优的治疗方法。
Health News. 2006 May;12(5):8-10.
2
PCI versus CABG for multivessel coronary disease in diabetics.糖尿病患者多支冠状动脉疾病的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术对比
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Jan 1;73(1):50-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21757.
3
CABG versus DES PCI in diabetics with multivessel disease: back to the BARI registry.多支血管病变糖尿病患者冠状动脉搭桥术与药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的比较：回顾BARI注册研究
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Jan 1;73(1):59-60. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21904.
4
Nonrandomized comparison of coronary artery bypass surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention for the treatment of unprotected left main coronary artery disease in octogenarians.八旬老人非保护左主干冠状动脉疾病治疗中冠状动脉搭桥手术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的非随机对照比较
Circulation. 2008 Dec 2;118(23):2374-81. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.727099. Epub 2008 Nov 24.
5
Outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents for patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.多支冠状动脉疾病患者冠状动脉搭桥术与药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的疗效比较
Circulation. 2007 Sep 11;116(11 Suppl):I200-6. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.681148.
6
Long-term outcomes of coronary-artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention for multivessel coronary artery disease in the bare-metal stent era.裸金属支架时代冠状动脉搭桥手术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗多支冠状动脉疾病的长期结果。
Circulation. 2008 Sep 30;118(14 Suppl):S199-209. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.735902.
7
Long-term mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent implantation versus coronary artery bypass surgery for the treatment of multivessel coronary artery disease.药物洗脱支架植入经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗多支冠状动脉疾病后的长期死亡率。
Circulation. 2008 Apr 22;117(16):2079-86. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.750109. Epub 2008 Apr 14.
8
Coronary artery bypass graft vs. percutaneous coronary angioplasty: CABG on the rebound?
Curr Opin Cardiol. 2007 Nov;22(6):517-23. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0b013e3282f001a2.
9
Long-term safety and efficacy of percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting and coronary artery bypass surgery for multivessel coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis with 5-year patient-level data from the ARTS, ERACI-II, MASS-II, and SoS trials.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗联合支架置入术与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗多支冠状动脉疾病的长期安全性和疗效：一项基于ARTS、ERACI-II、MASS-II和SoS试验5年患者水平数据的荟萃分析。
Circulation. 2008 Sep 9;118(11):1146-54. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.752147. Epub 2008 Aug 25.
10
The impact of age on outcomes after coronary artery bypass surgery versus stent-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention: one-year results from the Stent or Surgery (SoS) trial.年龄对冠状动脉搭桥手术与支架辅助经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后结局的影响：支架或手术（SoS）试验的一年结果
Am Heart J. 2006 Dec;152(6):1153-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2006.06.011.