Roy Kimberlee M, Roberts Michael C, Stewart Peter K
Dole Human Development Center, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA.
J Clin Psychol. 2006 Jul;62(7):893-905. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20271.
This study examined the research productivity of graduates of American Psychological Association accredited, clinical psychology doctoral programs who currently hold faculty positions. Normative averages of aggregated publications over the 2000-2004 five-year period were computed. Rankings based on the mean number of publications produced by graduates of each training program and the number of graduates were significantly correlated with U.S. News and World Report rankings, although some important differences were noted. Programs that have produced a larger number of faculty members were also more highly ranked but there was increased variability for the number of publications produced by the larger numbers of graduates. Objective outcome analyses such as graduates' publications may be preferable to more subjective reputation rankings of programs. Particularly for scientist-practitioner and clinical-scientist training programs, outcome data such as graduates' publications is an important aspect of the programs' continued self-study.
本研究调查了美国心理学会认可的临床心理学博士项目的毕业生，这些毕业生目前担任教职。计算了2000 - 2004年五年期间汇总出版物的规范平均值。根据每个培训项目毕业生的平均出版物数量和毕业生人数进行的排名，与《美国新闻与世界报道》的排名显著相关，不过也注意到了一些重要差异。培养出更多教职人员的项目排名也更高，但毕业生数量较多的项目所产生的出版物数量的变异性有所增加。诸如毕业生出版物之类的客观成果分析可能比项目更主观的声誉排名更可取。特别是对于科学家 - 从业者和临床科学家培训项目而言，毕业生出版物等成果数据是这些项目持续自我研究的一个重要方面。
