Jayadevappa Ravishankar, Chhatre Sumedha, Weiner Mark, Raziano Donna B
Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104-2676, USA.
Value Health. 2006 May-Jun;9(3):186-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2006.00099.x.
In this study we compared the readmissions, medical care cost, and health resource utilization (HRU) of acute care elderly (ACE) unit patients and usual medical care patients.
Retrospective case-control design was used. Patients admitted to ACE unit (n = 680) between 1999 and 2002 with primary admitting diagnosis of pneumonia, congestive heart failure, or urinary tract infection were randomly selected from the health-care system's administrative database. Equal number controls (n = 680) were selected from usual medical care services and were matched by DRG, age, ethnicity, and Charlson comorbidity score. Data on HRU, annual number of admissions before and after index admission, length of stay (LOS), and medical care cost were obtained. Bootstrap, t-test, and Wilcoxon test were used to compare cost, LOS, and number of readmissions between ACE and non-ACE unit. Multivariate log-linear and Poisson regressions were used to assess the impact of ACE unit on incremental cost and number of readmissions, respectively.
Mean LOS was 1 day shorter for ACE unit (4.9 vs. 5.9 P = 0.01). Mean cost of ACE unit was 9.7% lower than that of non-ACE unit (Dollars 13,586 vs. Dollars 15,040, P = 0.012). Both groups had similar costs of pharmacy, diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Multiple log-linear and Poisson regression models indicated that ACE unit patients had 21% lower cost and 11% lower annual readmissions.
Our results confirm the hypotheses that ACE unit patients have lower medical care cost, shorter LOS, and fewer readmissions. Thus, ACE unit may be a beneficial model for improved inpatient care of elderly.
在本研究中,我们比较了急性护理老年(ACE)病房患者和常规医疗患者的再入院情况、医疗费用以及健康资源利用(HRU)情况。
采用回顾性病例对照设计。从医疗系统管理数据库中随机选取1999年至2002年间因肺炎、充血性心力衰竭或尿路感染等主要入院诊断而入住ACE病房的患者(n = 680)。从常规医疗服务中选取数量相等的对照组(n = 680),并根据疾病诊断相关分组(DRG)、年龄、种族和查尔森合并症评分进行匹配。获取了关于HRU、索引入院前后的年度入院次数、住院时间(LOS)以及医疗费用的数据。采用自助法、t检验和威尔科克森检验来比较ACE病房和非ACE病房之间的费用、LOS和再入院次数。分别使用多变量对数线性回归和泊松回归来评估ACE病房对增量费用和再入院次数的影响。
ACE病房的平均住院时间短1天(4.9天对5.9天,P = 0.01)。ACE病房的平均费用比非ACE病房低9.7%(13586美元对15040美元,P = 0.012)。两组在药房、诊断和治疗程序方面的费用相似。多变量对数线性回归和泊松回归模型表明,ACE病房患者的费用降低了21%,年度再入院率降低了11%。
我们的结果证实了以下假设,即ACE病房患者的医疗费用更低、住院时间更短且再入院次数更少。因此,ACE病房可能是改善老年患者住院护理的有益模式。