Scholarly publishing. Bill would require free public access to research papers.
作者信息
Kaiser Jocelyn
出版信息
Science. 2006 May 12;312(5775):828. doi: 10.1126/science.312.5775.828a.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Scholarly publishing. Bill would require free public access to research papers.
Science. 2006 May 12;312(5775):828. doi: 10.1126/science.312.5775.828a.
2
Public access failure at PubMed.
Science. 2006 Jul 7;313(5783):43. doi: 10.1126/science.313.5783.43b.
3
Scientific publishing. NIH proposes 6-month public access to papers.
Science. 2004 Sep 10;305(5690):1548. doi: 10.1126/science.305.5690.1548b.
4
Publishers challenged over access to papers.
Nature. 2001 Mar 29;410(6828):502. doi: 10.1038/35069203.
5
Scientific publishing. NIH wants public access to papers 'as soon as possible'.
Science. 2005 Feb 11;307(5711):825. doi: 10.1126/science.307.5711.825.
6
Scholarly publishing. House weighs proposal to block mandatory 'Open Access'.
Science. 2008 Sep 19;321(5896):1621. doi: 10.1126/science.321.5896.1621a.
7
Congress pushes plan to make papers free.
Nature. 2006 Jun 22;441(7096):915. doi: 10.1038/441915a.
8
Searching for common ground: public access policy and the Scholarly Publishing Roundtable.
J Med Libr Assoc. 2010 Oct;98(4):270-2. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.98.4.002.
9
Scientific publishing. Zerhouni plans a nudge toward open access.
Science. 2004 Sep 3;305(5689):1386. doi: 10.1126/science.305.5689.1386b.
10
Open access as public policy.
PLoS Biol. 2004 Oct;2(10):e353. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020353. Epub 2004 Sep 21.
引用本文的文献
1
The NIH public access policy did not harm biomedical journals.
PLoS Biol. 2019 Oct 23;17(10):e3000352. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000352. eCollection 2019 Oct.
Zotero 插件