Biodiversity Institute, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, United States of America.
Center for Research Methods & Data Analysis, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, United States of America.
PLoS Biol. 2019 Oct 23;17(10):e3000352. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000352. eCollection 2019 Oct.
The United States National Institutes of Health (NIH) imposed a public access policy on all publications for which the research was supported by their grants; the policy was drafted in 2004 and took effect in 2008. The policy is now 11 years old, yet no analysis has been presented to assess whether in fact this largest-scale US-based public access policy affected the vitality of the scholarly publishing enterprise, as manifested in changed mortality or natality rates of biomedical journals. We show here that implementation of the NIH policy was associated with slightly elevated mortality rates and mildly depressed natality rates of biomedical journals, but that birth rates so exceeded death rates that numbers of biomedical journals continued to rise, even in the face of the implementation of such a sweeping public access policy.
美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)对其资助的所有研究出版物都实施了公开获取政策;该政策于 2004 年起草,并于 2008 年生效。该政策已经实施了 11 年,但尚未进行任何分析来评估这一基于美国最大规模的公开获取政策是否实际上影响了学术出版企业的活力,表现为生物医学期刊的死亡率或出生率的变化。我们在这里表明,NIH 政策的实施与生物医学期刊的死亡率略有升高和出生率轻度下降有关,但出生率大大超过死亡率,以至于生物医学期刊的数量继续增加,即使面对这样一项全面的公开获取政策的实施。