Suppr超能文献

特非那定与氯雷他定治疗花粉症的对比效果

Comparative effects of terfenadine and loratadine in the treatment of hay fever.

作者信息

Ciprandi G, Iudice A, Tosca M A, Ruffoni S, Buscaglia S, Canonica G W

机构信息

Dept. of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, Italy.

出版信息

J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 1991 Dec;1(6):368-72.

PMID:1669595
Abstract

This double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study was undertaken in 40 patients with seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis during the 1990 hay fever season. The patients were randomized and treated for seven days with either 120 mg terfenadine or 10 mg loratadine, each drug taken once daily in the morning. The severity of nasal congestion, rhinorrhea, sneezing, nasopharyngeal itching, and itchy, watery, red eyes was evaluated before and at the end of treatment. The global severity of symptoms was ranked daily by the patient on a diary card. Both treatment groups experienced a significant improvement of symptoms after treatment (p < 0.01), without any significant difference between the two study drugs. Terfenadine and loratadine significantly improved symptom severity by 69 and 55% compared with the baseline values, respectively. Headache and fatigue were reported in three loratadine-treated patients, and sedation in one patient. No side effects were observed in patients receiving terfenadine. This study confirmed that terfenadine 120 mg once daily is a safe and effective treatment for hay fever.

摘要

这项双盲、双模拟、平行组研究于1990年花粉热季节对40例季节性变应性鼻结膜炎患者进行。患者被随机分组,用120毫克特非那定或10毫克氯雷他定治疗7天,每种药物均于早晨每日服用1次。在治疗前和治疗结束时评估鼻塞、流涕、打喷嚏、鼻咽部瘙痒以及眼痒、流泪、眼红的严重程度。患者每天在日记卡上对症状的总体严重程度进行评分。两个治疗组在治疗后症状均有显著改善(p<0.01),两种研究药物之间无任何显著差异。与基线值相比,特非那定和氯雷他定分别使症状严重程度显著改善了69%和55%。3例接受氯雷他定治疗的患者报告有头痛和疲劳,1例患者有镇静作用。接受特非那定治疗的患者未观察到副作用。本研究证实,每日1次服用120毫克特非那定是治疗花粉热的一种安全有效的方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验