Kesic V
Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinical Center of Serbia, Visegradska 26, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia and Montenegro.
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2006 Oct;32(8):832-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2006.03.037. Epub 2006 May 12.
The aim of the article was to review the current approach to management of cervical cancer.
The relevant literature has served as a source for review of different options applied in the management of cervical cancer.
Treatment of invasive cervical cancer is affected by the stage of the disease, which is based on clinical evaluation. Microinvasive carcinoma of the cervix has limited metastatic potential and therefore is most likely curable by non-radical treatment. There is no standard management of stage Ib-IIa cervical carcinoma. Both radical surgery and radical radiotherapy have proven to be equally effective, but differ in associated morbidity and complications. Most often, stage Ib1 cervical cancer is treated by radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy. Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy has shown similar efficacy and recurrence rates. Radical vaginal trachelectomy with laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy may be an option in small cervical cancer where preservation of fertility is desired. There is lot of conflicting published work regarding the treatment of bulky stage Ib-IIa cervical cancer. While some centers are performing primary surgery as for Ib1 disease followed by tailored postoperative radiation with or without chemotherapy, the others are in favor of primary chemo-radiation therapy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical surgery has emerged as a possible alternative, which may improve a survival in patients with stage Ib2 disease. Concomitant chemoradiation is becoming a new standard in treatment of advanced disease, because it has been clearly shown to improve disease-free, progression-free and overall survival. Management of recurrent disease depends on previous treatment, site and extent of recurrence, disease-free interval and patient's performance status.
Treatment decisions should be individualized and based on multiple factors including the stage of the disease, age, medical condition of the patient, tumor-related factors and treatment preferences, to yield the best cure with minimum complications.
本文旨在综述目前宫颈癌的管理方法。
相关文献作为回顾宫颈癌管理中应用的不同选择的资料来源。
浸润性宫颈癌的治疗受疾病分期影响,疾病分期基于临床评估。宫颈微浸润癌转移潜能有限,因此很可能通过非根治性治疗治愈。对于Ib-IIa期宫颈癌,尚无标准的管理方法。根治性手术和根治性放疗均已证明同样有效,但在相关发病率和并发症方面有所不同。最常见的是,Ib1期宫颈癌通过根治性子宫切除术加盆腔淋巴结清扫术进行治疗。腹腔镜辅助根治性阴道子宫切除术已显示出相似的疗效和复发率。对于希望保留生育功能的小宫颈癌,根治性阴道宫颈切除术加腹腔镜盆腔淋巴结清扫术可能是一种选择。关于大块状Ib-IIa期宫颈癌的治疗,有许多相互矛盾的已发表研究。一些中心对Ib1期疾病进行原发性手术,随后根据情况进行术后放疗,可联合或不联合化疗,而其他中心则倾向于原发性放化疗。新辅助化疗后行根治性手术已成为一种可能的替代方案,这可能提高Ib2期疾病患者的生存率。同步放化疗正成为晚期疾病治疗的新标准,因为已明确显示其可提高无病生存期、无进展生存期和总生存期。复发性疾病的管理取决于先前的治疗、复发部位和范围、无病间期以及患者的表现状态。
治疗决策应个体化,并基于多种因素,包括疾病分期、年龄、患者的医疗状况、肿瘤相关因素和治疗偏好,以在并发症最少的情况下实现最佳治愈效果。