Herron J E, Wilding E L
School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF10 3AT, Wales, UK.
Neuroimage. 2006 Aug 15;32(2):863-70. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.03.046. Epub 2006 May 15.
In recent event-related potential (ERP) studies of episodic retrieval, ERPs have been acquired in tasks where participants have been cued trial-by-trial to prepare either to make episodic or semantic retrieval judgments. ERPs elicited during this preparatory cue period and separated according to retrieval task have diverged at right frontal scalp electrodes, with a relatively greater positivity associated with preparation for episodic rather than for semantic retrieval. Importantly, this pattern of differences has been observed only on 'stay' trials: those trials where the participant was cued to prepare for the same retrieval task on the previous trial. These findings have provided the basis for the proposal that the ERP modulations index processes that support the adoption or configuration of retrieval mode - a tonic process that can be sustained while recovery of episodic information is required and which facilitates the retrieval process. In these studies, however, the preparatory period on each trial was no more than 2000 ms, raising the possibility that, with more time available, neural correlates of these preparatory processes would not be restricted to stay trials. In this experiment, participants were cued trial-by-trial to complete either an episodic or a semantic retrieval task, and the preparatory period was greater than 4000 ms on the majority of trials. In keeping with previous findings, the ERPs elicited by these two cue types diverged principally on stay trials at right frontal electrode locations, suggesting that time to prepare is not the primary determinant of the onset of task-specific preparatory retrieval processing. In an important addition to previous findings, moreover, the accuracy of episodic memory judgments increased with the number of successive trials of the same task that participants completed, a finding consistent with the view that adopting a retrieval mode successfully can influence the accuracy of episodic memory judgments.
在近期关于情景记忆提取的事件相关电位(ERP)研究中,ERP是在这样的任务中获取的:在每次试验中向参与者发出提示,让他们准备好做出情景或语义提取判断。在这个准备提示期诱发的ERP,并根据提取任务进行区分,在右侧额部头皮电极处出现了差异,与情景提取准备相关的正电位相对更大,而不是语义提取准备。重要的是,这种差异模式仅在“持续”试验中观察到:即参与者在前一次试验中被提示为相同提取任务做准备的那些试验。这些发现为以下提议提供了基础:ERP调制指数过程支持提取模式的采用或配置——这是一个持续性过程,在需要情景信息恢复时可以维持,并有助于提取过程。然而,在这些研究中,每次试验的准备期不超过2000毫秒,这就增加了一种可能性,即如果有更多时间,这些准备过程的神经关联不会仅限于持续试验。在本实验中,每次试验向参与者发出提示,让他们完成情景或语义提取任务,并且在大多数试验中准备期大于4000毫秒。与之前的发现一致,这两种提示类型诱发的ERP主要在右侧额部电极位置的持续试验中出现差异,表明准备时间不是特定任务准备性提取处理开始的主要决定因素。此外,除了之前的发现之外,一个重要的补充是,情景记忆判断的准确性随着参与者完成的同一任务连续试验次数的增加而提高,这一发现与成功采用提取模式可以影响情景记忆判断准确性的观点一致。