• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)术前肝脏血流动力学与术后肝性脑病发生率的关系。

Relationship between pre-TIPS hepatic hemodynamics and postoperative incidence of hepatic encephalopathy.

作者信息

Deng Dan, Liao Ming-Song, Qin Jian-Ping, Li Xiao-An

机构信息

Department of Ultrasonography, General Hospital, Chengdu Military Command, Chengdu 610083, China.

出版信息

Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2006 May;5(2):232-6.

PMID:16698582
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is one of the complications that have limited the effectiveness of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) most significantly. Up to the present, the predicting factors of HE post-TIPS have been debated controversially. This study was undertaken to verify the relationship between pre-TIPS intrahepatic hemodynamics and the incidence of post-TIPS HE.

METHODS

The hepatic blood dynamics was evaluated in 41 patients with liver cirrhosis before TIPS and at one month after TIPS by ultrasonography. The patients were divided into two groups according to Doppler findings before TIPS: group 1, patients with prograde portal flow, and group 2, patients with hepatofugal or back-forth portal flow. The clinical characteristics (age, sex, etiology of liver disease, pre-TIPS Child-Pugh score, incidence of pre-TIPS HE, and portacaval pressure gradient), incidence of post TIPS HE, and pre-/post-TIPS hepatic arterial resistant index (RI) in the two groups were compared. The independent prognostic value of pre-TIPS variables for the onset of HE after TIPS, including age, Child-Pugh score, presence of HE before TIPS, and the pattern of portal flow, was tested with a multiple-factor regression analysis.

RESULTS

No significant difference in age, etiology of liver disease, indications of TIPS placement, incidence of HE before TIPS, and portacaval gradient before and after TIPS was observed between the two groups; but liver failure was more severe in group 2 (P<0.05). The incidence of post-TIPS HE in group 2 was significantly lower than that in group 1 (P<0.01). Pre-TIPS, the RI of the hepatic artery in group 1 was significantly higher than that in group 2 (P<0.01). However, TIPS induced a significantly decreased RI in group 1 (P<0.01), but not in group 2. Multiple-factor regression analysis demonstrated that the pattern of portal flow before TIPS was closely associated with the onset of post TIPS HE.

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-TIPS intrahepatic hemodynamics is closely related to the incidence of post-TIPS HE. Hepatic hemodynamics of patients with hepatofugal portal blood flow only changes a little after TIPS and still provides compensatory blood supply of the hepatic artery, and the hepatic function is less affected. Hence HE is unlikely. Hepatic hemodynamics of patients with prograde portal blood flow changes a lot after TIPS, and dual blood supply of the portal vein and hepatic artery changes into compensatory blood supply of the hepatic artery, and hepatic function suffers greatly in a short time. Thus HE is mostly likely.

摘要

背景

肝性脑病(HE)是最显著限制经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)疗效的并发症之一。迄今为止,TIPS术后HE的预测因素一直存在争议。本研究旨在验证TIPS术前肝内血流动力学与TIPS术后HE发生率之间的关系。

方法

通过超声检查对41例肝硬化患者在TIPS术前及术后1个月进行肝脏血流动力学评估。根据TIPS术前的多普勒检查结果将患者分为两组:第1组为门静脉血流正向的患者,第2组为门静脉血流离肝或来回流动的患者。比较两组的临床特征(年龄、性别、肝病病因、TIPS术前Child-Pugh评分、TIPS术前HE发生率和门腔压力梯度)、TIPS术后HE发生率以及两组TIPS术前/术后肝动脉阻力指数(RI)。采用多因素回归分析检验TIPS术前变量(包括年龄、Child-Pugh评分、TIPS术前HE的存在情况和门静脉血流模式)对TIPS术后HE发生的独立预后价值。

结果

两组在年龄、肝病病因、TIPS置入指征、TIPS术前HE发生率以及TIPS术前和术后的门腔梯度方面均未观察到显著差异;但第2组的肝功能衰竭更严重(P<0.05)。第2组TIPS术后HE的发生率显著低于第1组(P<0.01)。TIPS术前,第1组肝动脉的RI显著高于第2组(P<0.01)。然而,TIPS使第1组的RI显著降低(P<0.01),而第2组则未降低。多因素回归分析表明,TIPS术前的门静脉血流模式与TIPS术后HE的发生密切相关。

结论

TIPS术前肝内血流动力学与TIPS术后HE的发生率密切相关。门静脉血流离肝的患者TIPS术后肝血流动力学变化较小,仍能提供肝动脉的代偿性供血,肝功能受影响较小。因此不太可能发生HE。门静脉血流正向的患者TIPS术后肝血流动力学变化较大,门静脉和肝动脉的双重供血转变为肝动脉的代偿性供血,肝功能在短时间内受到很大影响。因此最有可能发生HE。

相似文献

1
Relationship between pre-TIPS hepatic hemodynamics and postoperative incidence of hepatic encephalopathy.经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)术前肝脏血流动力学与术后肝性脑病发生率的关系。
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2006 May;5(2):232-6.
2
Relationship between pre-TIPS liver perfusion by the portal vein and the incidence of post-TIPS chronic hepatic encephalopathy.经门静脉的TIPS术前肝脏灌注与TIPS术后慢性肝性脑病发生率之间的关系
Am J Gastroenterol. 2001 Apr;96(4):1205-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.03704.x.
3
Risk Factors for Hepatic Encephalopathy after Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Portal Hypertension.肝细胞癌合并门静脉高压患者经颈静脉肝内门体分流术后肝性脑病的危险因素
J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2015 Sep;24(3):301-7. doi: 10.15403/jgld.2014.1121.243.yao.
4
[Evaluation of hepatic encephalopathy and portal hemodynamics by Doppler ultrasonography after a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt].经颈静脉肝内门体分流术后多普勒超声对肝性脑病和门静脉血流动力学的评估
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi. 1997 Apr;57(5):233-7.
5
Targeted puncture of left branch of intrahepatic portal vein in transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt to reduce hepatic encephalopathy.经颈静脉肝内门体分流术时经皮穿刺左支门静脉以减少肝性脑病。
World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Mar 7;25(9):1088-1099. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i9.1088.
6
Long-term clinical outcomes in patients with viral hepatitis related liver cirrhosis after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt treatment.经颈静脉肝内门体分流术治疗后病毒性肝炎相关肝硬化患者的长期临床结局。
Virol J. 2018 Oct 1;15(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s12985-018-1067-7.
7
[Effects of percutaneous intrahepatic portosystemic shunt on splanchnic and systemic hemodynamics in patients with portal hypertension].经皮肝内门体分流术对门静脉高压症患者内脏和全身血流动力学的影响
Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1997 Jan;20(1):1-4.
8
Clinical efficacy of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt created with covered stents with different diameters: results of a randomized controlled trial.经覆膜支架不同直径建立经颈静脉肝内门体分流术的临床疗效:一项随机对照试验的结果。
J Hepatol. 2010 Aug;53(2):267-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2010.02.033. Epub 2010 Apr 27.
9
Circulating Elastin Fragments Are Not Affected by Hepatic, Renal and Hemodynamic Changes, But Reflect Survival in Cirrhosis with TIPS.循环弹性蛋白片段不受肝脏、肾脏和血流动力学变化的影响,但反映了经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)治疗肝硬化患者的生存率。
Dig Dis Sci. 2015 Nov;60(11):3456-64. doi: 10.1007/s10620-015-3783-9. Epub 2015 Jul 3.
10
TIPS for management of refractory ascites: response and survival are both unpredictable.难治性腹水的管理提示:反应和生存均不可预测。
Dig Dis Sci. 2003 Mar;48(3):542-50. doi: 10.1023/a:1022544917898.

引用本文的文献

1
Post-Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt (TIPS) Hepatic Encephalopathy-A Review of the Past Decade's Literature Focusing on Incidence, Risk Factors, and Prophylaxis.经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)相关性肝性脑病——基于发病率、危险因素及预防的过去十年文献综述
J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 19;13(1):14. doi: 10.3390/jcm13010014.
2
Predictors of Occurrence and Risk of Hepatic Encephalopathy After TIPS Creation: A 15-Year Experience.经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)后肝性脑病发生和风险的预测因素:15 年经验。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2020 Aug;43(8):1156-1164. doi: 10.1007/s00270-020-02512-7. Epub 2020 May 20.
3
Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS): current indications and strategies to improve the outcomes.
经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS):当前适应证及改善治疗效果的策略
Intern Emerg Med. 2020 Jan;15(1):37-48. doi: 10.1007/s11739-019-02252-8. Epub 2020 Jan 9.
4
Pathological Features of Mitochondrial Ultrastructure Predict Susceptibility to Post-TIPS Hepatic Encephalopathy.线粒体超微结构的病理特征可预测 TIPS 术后肝性脑病的易感性。
Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Jul 16;2018:4671590. doi: 10.1155/2018/4671590. eCollection 2018.
5
Surgical portosystemic shunts versus devascularisation procedures for prevention of variceal rebleeding in people with hepatosplenic schistosomiasis.外科门体分流术与去血管化手术预防肝脾型血吸虫病患者静脉曲张再出血的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 3;8(8):CD011717. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011717.pub2.
6
Therapy Algorithm for Portal Vein Thrombosis in Liver Cirrhosis: The Internist's Point of View.肝硬化门静脉血栓形成的治疗算法:内科医生的观点
Viszeralmedizin. 2014 Dec;30(6):401-8. doi: 10.1159/000370053.