Fujitani Shigeki, Yu Victor L
Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, PA 15240, USA.
J Intensive Care Med. 2006 Jan-Feb;21(1):17-21. doi: 10.1177/0885066605283094.
The ideal diagnostic approach for ventilator-associated pneumonia currently is based on invasive procedures to obtain respiratory tract cultures. Given the lack of consensus and relatively poor acceptance of full bronchoscopic bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and protected specimen brush (PSB), less invasive procedures have been developed. We review the nonbronchoscopic procedures (nonbronchoscopic bronchoalveolar lavage, including mini-BAL, blinded protected specimen, and blinded bronchial sampling) and endotracheal aspiration. We provide a critique of the methods used, the types of catheters inserted, and the sample collection methods. Most studies were flawed in that antibiotic use before initiation of the procedure was not controlled. The variability of both the methods and the criteria for the gold standard in the numerous investigations show that these procedures are neither standardized nor proven to be accurate and often did not improve management. Pending future studies, use of endotracheal aspirates without the use of quantitation seems to be a reasonable approach for clinicians who are not committed to an invasive procedure.
目前,呼吸机相关性肺炎的理想诊断方法是基于获取呼吸道培养物的侵入性操作。鉴于对全支气管镜支气管肺泡灌洗(BAL)和保护性标本刷检(PSB)缺乏共识且接受度相对较低,已开发出侵入性较小的操作方法。我们回顾了非支气管镜操作方法(非支气管镜支气管肺泡灌洗,包括微型BAL、盲法保护性标本采集和盲法支气管采样)以及气管内吸引。我们对所使用的方法、插入导管的类型和样本采集方法进行了评论。大多数研究存在缺陷,因为在操作开始前未控制抗生素的使用。众多研究中方法和金标准标准的变异性表明,这些操作既未标准化,也未被证明准确,且往往无法改善治疗管理。在未来研究之前,对于不倾向于采用侵入性操作的临床医生而言,不进行定量的气管内吸引物的使用似乎是一种合理的方法。