Petersen Charlotte C, Petersen Mikkel S, Agger Ralf, Hokland Marianne E
Institute of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Aarhus University, Aarhus 8000, Denmark.
J Immunother. 2006 May-Jun;29(3):241-9. doi: 10.1097/01.cji.0000203078.97493.c3.
Accumulation of T cells at the tumor is essential in cancer immunotherapy based on adoptive transfer of tumor-specific T cells. To gain further insight into the accumulation process and to evaluate the effect of using different routes of cell transfer, we investigated the accumulation of ovalbumin-specific CD8+ T cells (OT-I) injected either intravenously (IV) or intraperitoneally (IP) into mice carrying a subcutaneous tumor of the ovalbumin-expressing melanoma cell line B16-OVA. Maximal accumulation of the adoptively transferred cells in tumor tissue was observed 5 days after injection, irrespective of the injection route. The route of injection affected neither the total number of adoptively transferred cells found in tumor tissue nor the kinetics of this accumulation. In the spleen, however, the accumulation of adoptively transferred cells was clearly dependent on the injection route. IP injections resulted in a large number of adoptively transferred cells in the spleen on all days analyzed. In comparison, IV injection resulted in significantly fewer adoptively transferred cells in the spleen, and this number decreased over time. The route of injection affected neither the activation status of the adoptively transferred T cells that accumulated at the tumor site, nor the ability of these cells to control tumor growth. Two cell populations, SIINFEKL-tetramer(Low)(Tet(Low))CD69+ CD25+ and Tet(high)CD69- CD25-, were present in tumor samples, whereas only Tet(High)CD69- CD25- cells accumulated in the spleen. In tumors, IV injection resulted in a higher fraction of adoptively transferred cells with an activated phenotype (Tet(Low)CD69+ CD25+) compared with IP injection.
在基于肿瘤特异性T细胞过继转移的癌症免疫治疗中,T细胞在肿瘤部位的聚集至关重要。为了更深入了解聚集过程并评估使用不同细胞转移途径的效果,我们研究了将卵清蛋白特异性CD8+ T细胞(OT-I)静脉内(IV)或腹腔内(IP)注射到携带表达卵清蛋白的黑色素瘤细胞系B16-OVA皮下肿瘤的小鼠体内后的聚集情况。无论注射途径如何,在注射后5天观察到过继转移细胞在肿瘤组织中的最大聚集。注射途径既不影响在肿瘤组织中发现的过继转移细胞总数,也不影响这种聚集的动力学。然而,在脾脏中,过继转移细胞的聚集明显依赖于注射途径。在所有分析的日子里,IP注射导致脾脏中有大量过继转移细胞。相比之下,IV注射导致脾脏中过继转移细胞明显较少,并且这个数量随时间减少。注射途径既不影响在肿瘤部位聚集的过继转移T细胞的激活状态,也不影响这些细胞控制肿瘤生长的能力。肿瘤样本中存在两个细胞群体,SIINFEKL-四聚体(低)(Tet(低))CD69+ CD25+和Tet(高)CD69- CD2(低),而脾脏中仅积累Tet(高)CD69- CD25-细胞。在肿瘤中,与IP注射相比,IV注射导致具有活化表型(Tet(低)CD69+ CD25+)的过继转移细胞比例更高。