Fisher Diana O, Owens Ian P F
School of Botany and Zoology, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia.
Trends Ecol Evol. 2004 Jul;19(7):391-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2004.05.004.
The phylogenetic comparative approach is a statistical method for analyzing correlations between traits across species. Whilst it has revolutionized evolutionary biology, can it work for conservation biology? Although it is correlative, advocates of the comparative method hope that it will reveal general mechanisms in conservation, provide shortcuts for prioritizing conservation research, and enable us to predict which species will experience (or create) problems in the future. Here, we ask whether these stated management goals are being achieved. We conclude that comparative methods are stimulating research into the ecological mechanisms underlying conservation, and are providing information for preemptive screening of problem species. But comparative analyses of extinction risk to date have tended to be too broad in scope to provide shortcuts to conserving particular endangered species. Correlates of vulnerability to conservation problems are often taxon, region and threat specific, so models must be narrowly focused to be of maximum practical use.
系统发育比较方法是一种用于分析跨物种性状之间相关性的统计方法。虽然它给进化生物学带来了变革,但它能应用于保护生物学吗?尽管它只是相关性的方法,但比较方法的支持者希望它能揭示保护中的一般机制,为保护研究的优先排序提供捷径,并使我们能够预测哪些物种在未来会遇到(或引发)问题。在此,我们探讨这些既定的管理目标是否正在实现。我们得出的结论是,比较方法正在推动对保护背后生态机制的研究,并为问题物种的预防性筛选提供信息。但迄今为止,对灭绝风险的比较分析往往范围过于宽泛,无法为保护特定濒危物种提供捷径。对保护问题的脆弱性相关因素通常具有分类群、区域和威胁的特异性,因此模型必须聚焦于狭窄范围才能具有最大的实际用途。