Lloyd-Smith James O, Cross Paul C, Briggs Cheryl J, Daugherty Matt, Getz Wayne M, Latto John, Sanchez Maria S, Smith Adam B, Swei Andrea
Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720-3114, USA.
Trends Ecol Evol. 2005 Sep;20(9):511-9. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2005.07.004. Epub 2005 Jul 22.
Host population thresholds for the invasion or persistence of infectious disease are core concepts of disease ecology and underlie disease control policies based on culling and vaccination. However, empirical evidence for these thresholds in wildlife populations has been sparse, although recent studies have begun to address this gap. Here, we review the theoretical bases and empirical evidence for disease thresholds in wildlife. We see that, by their nature, these thresholds are rarely abrupt and always difficult to measure, and important facets of wildlife ecology are neglected by current theories. Empirical studies seeking to identify disease thresholds in wildlife encounter recurring obstacles of small sample sizes and confounding factors. Disease control policies based solely on threshold targets are rarely warranted, but management to reduce abundance of susceptible hosts can be effective.
传染病入侵或持续存在的宿主种群阈值是疾病生态学的核心概念,也是基于扑杀和疫苗接种的疾病控制政策的基础。然而,野生动物种群中这些阈值的实证证据一直很少,尽管最近的研究已开始填补这一空白。在此,我们回顾了野生动物疾病阈值的理论基础和实证证据。我们发现,就其本质而言,这些阈值很少是突然的,而且总是难以测量,当前理论忽视了野生动物生态学的重要方面。试图确定野生动物疾病阈值的实证研究经常遇到样本量小和混杂因素等反复出现的障碍。仅基于阈值目标的疾病控制政策很少有依据,但降低易感宿主数量的管理措施可能有效。