Suppr超能文献

从在涉及肠道菌群的病理学中的潜在应用角度看,瑞莫拉宁及对照药物对厌氧肠道细菌的体外活性

In vitro activity of ramoplanin and comparator drugs against anaerobic intestinal bacteria from the perspective of potential utility in pathology involving bowel flora.

作者信息

Finegold Sydney M, John Shahera St, Vu Ann W, Li Calida M, Molitoris Denise, Song Yuli, Liu Chengxu, Wexler Hannah M

机构信息

Medical Service, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA 90073, USA.

出版信息

Anaerobe. 2004 Aug;10(4):205-11. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2004.04.003.

Abstract

Susceptibility of intestinal bacteria to various antimicrobial agents in vitro, together with levels of those agents achieved in the gut, provides information on the likely impact of the agents on the intestinal flora. Orally administered drugs that are poorly absorbed may be useful for treatment of intestinal infections and for certain other situations in which intestinal bacteria may play a role. The antimicrobial activity of ramoplanin (MDL 62,198) against 928 strains of intestinal anaerobic bacteria was determined using the NCCLS-approved Wadsworth brucella laked-blood agar dilution method. The activity of ramoplanin was compared with that of ampicillin, bacitracin, metronidazole, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX), and vancomycin. The organisms tested included Bacteroides fragilis group (n=89), other Bacteroides species (n=16), other anaerobic Gram-negative rods (n=56) anaerobic cocci (n=114), Clostridium species (n=426), and non-sporeforming anaerobic Gram-positive rods (n=227). The overall MIC(90)s of ramoplanin, ampicillin, bacitracin, metronidazole, and vancomycin were 256, 32, 128, 16, and 128 mcg/ml, respectively. Ramoplanin was almost always highly active vs. Gram-positive organisms and relatively poor in activity against Gram-negative organisms, particularly Bacteroides, Bilophila, Prevotella, and Veillonella. Vancomycin was quite similar to ramoplanin in its activity. Ampicillin was relatively poor in activity vs. organisms that often produce beta-lactamase, including most of the Gram-negative rods as well as Clostridium bolteae and C. clostridioforme. Bacitracin was relatively poor in activity against most anaerobic Gram-negative rods, but better vs. most Gram-positive organisms. Metronidazole was very active against all groups other than bifidobacteria and some strains of other types of non-sporeforming Gram-positive bacilli. TMP/SMX was very poorly active, with an MIC(90) of >2048 mcg/ml.

摘要

肠道细菌在体外对各种抗菌剂的敏感性,以及这些抗菌剂在肠道内达到的水平,提供了有关这些抗菌剂对肠道菌群可能影响的信息。口服吸收差的药物可能对治疗肠道感染以及肠道细菌可能起作用的某些其他情况有用。使用美国国家临床实验室标准委员会(NCCLS)认可的沃兹沃思布鲁氏菌湖血琼脂稀释法,测定了雷莫拉宁(MDL 62,198)对928株肠道厌氧菌的抗菌活性。将雷莫拉宁的活性与氨苄西林、杆菌肽、甲硝唑、甲氧苄啶/磺胺甲恶唑(TMP/SMX)和万古霉素的活性进行了比较。所测试的微生物包括脆弱拟杆菌群(n = 89)、其他拟杆菌属(n = 16)、其他厌氧革兰氏阴性杆菌(n = 56)、厌氧球菌(n = 114)、梭菌属(n = 426)和无芽孢厌氧革兰氏阳性杆菌(n = 227)。雷莫拉宁、氨苄西林、杆菌肽、甲硝唑和万古霉素的总体MIC(90)分别为256、32、128、16和128 mcg/ml。雷莫拉宁对革兰氏阳性菌几乎总是具有高活性,而对革兰氏阴性菌,特别是拟杆菌属、嗜胆菌属、普雷沃菌属和韦荣球菌属的活性相对较差。万古霉素的活性与雷莫拉宁非常相似。氨苄西林对经常产生β-内酰胺酶的微生物,包括大多数革兰氏阴性杆菌以及博氏梭菌和梭状梭菌的活性相对较差。杆菌肽对大多数厌氧革兰氏阴性杆菌的活性相对较差,但对大多数革兰氏阳性菌的活性较好。甲硝唑对双歧杆菌和其他一些非芽孢形成革兰氏阳性杆菌菌株以外的所有菌群都非常有活性。TMP/SMX的活性非常低,MIC(90)>2048 mcg/ml。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验