• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关注这条线索:探究假性忽视的激活-定向假说。

Putting attention on the line: investigating the activation-orientation hypothesis of pseudoneglect.

作者信息

Bultitude Janet H, Aimola Davies Anne M

机构信息

School of Psychology, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.

出版信息

Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(10):1849-58. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.03.001. Epub 2006 May 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.03.001
PMID:16701730
Abstract

Neurologically healthy participants systematically misbisect horizontal lines to the left of centre, a phenomenon termed 'pseudoneglect'. According to the activation-orientation hypothesis, the distribution of attention is biased in the direction opposite to the more activated hemisphere. Since visuospatial tasks involve activation of the right hemisphere, the hypothesis suggests that a leftward line-bisection bias might be explained by the uneven distribution of attention to the left and right line segments. A crucial assumption of this explanation is that the more attended half of the line will be perceived as longer than the less attended half. This study uses a tachistoscopic Landmark test and an attention cueing paradigm to explore this assumption. Three conditions were met to demonstrate the relative elongation of the more attended half of the line: (1) attention was biased to the cued end of the line, (2) subjective line midpoint was shifted towards the cued end, and (3) alternative biasing factors were ruled out. The results also demonstrate that increased hemispheric activation, resulting from presentation of stimuli in one or the other visual field, leads to subjective midpoints that are biased away from the more activated hemisphere.

摘要

神经系统健康的参与者会系统性地将水平线段的中点误判在中心左侧,这种现象被称为“假性忽视”。根据激活-方向假说,注意力的分布在与激活程度较高的半球相反的方向上存在偏差。由于视觉空间任务涉及右半球的激活,该假说认为向左的线段二等分偏差可能是由于对左右线段的注意力分布不均所致。这种解释的一个关键假设是,被更多关注的线段一半会被感知为比关注较少的一半更长。本研究使用速示地标测试和注意力提示范式来探究这一假设。满足了三个条件以证明被更多关注的线段一半的相对延长:(1)注意力偏向线段的提示端,(2)主观线段中点向提示端偏移,以及(3)排除了其他偏向因素。结果还表明,由于在一个或另一个视野中呈现刺激而导致的半球激活增加,会导致主观中点向远离激活程度较高半球的方向偏移。

相似文献

1
Putting attention on the line: investigating the activation-orientation hypothesis of pseudoneglect.关注这条线索:探究假性忽视的激活-定向假说。
Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(10):1849-58. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.03.001. Epub 2006 May 15.
2
The neural basis of vertical and horizontal line bisection judgments: an fMRI study of normal volunteers.垂直与水平直线二等分判断的神经基础:一项针对正常志愿者的功能磁共振成像研究
Neuroimage. 2001 Jul;14(1 Pt 2):S59-67. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2001.0819.
3
Line bisection in left neglect: the importance of starting right.左侧忽视中的直线二等分:从右侧开始的重要性。
Cortex. 2008 Jul-Aug;44(7):782-93. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2007.04.001. Epub 2007 Dec 23.
4
The egocentric reference deviation of neglect patients is influenced by visuospatial attention.忽视症患者的自我中心参照偏差受视觉空间注意的影响。
Neuropsychologia. 2005;43(12):1784-91. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.02.003.
5
Prism adaptation overcomes pseudoneglect for the greyscales task.棱镜适应克服了灰度任务中的假性忽视。
Cortex. 2009 Apr;45(4):537-43. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2007.12.011. Epub 2008 Mar 2.
6
Attention biases the perceived midpoint of horizontal lines.注意偏向会影响对水平线段中点的感知。
Neuropsychologia. 2011 Jan;49(2):238-46. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.11.022. Epub 2010 Nov 24.
7
The influence of unimanual response on pseudoneglect magnitude.单手反应对假性忽视程度的影响。
Brain Cogn. 2001 Feb;45(1):52-63. doi: 10.1006/brcg.2000.1255.
8
The centre is not in the middle: evidence from line and word bisection.中心不在正中间:来自线条和单词二分的证据。
Neuropsychologia. 2010 Jun;48(7):2140-6. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.04.005. Epub 2010 Apr 10.
9
How do patients with neglect see a horizontal line? Analysis of performances in coloured line bisection task.忽视症患者如何看待一条横线?彩色线段二等分任务中的表现分析。
J Neurol. 2004 Jun;251(6):696-703. doi: 10.1007/s00415-004-0404-5.
10
Left minineglect or inverse pseudoneglect in children with dyslexia?阅读障碍儿童存在左侧半侧空间忽视或反向假性忽视吗?
Neuroreport. 2011 Jan 26;22(2):93-6. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e328342d2df.

引用本文的文献

1
A meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging tasks associated with pseudoneglect.一项关于与假性忽视相关的功能性神经成像任务的荟萃分析。
Exp Brain Res. 2025 Apr 18;243(5):122. doi: 10.1007/s00221-025-07077-w.
2
Gaze data of 4243 participants shows link between leftward and superior attention biases and age.4243 名参与者的注视数据显示,左视和上视注意力偏向与年龄有关。
Exp Brain Res. 2024 Jun;242(6):1327-1337. doi: 10.1007/s00221-024-06823-w. Epub 2024 Mar 31.
3
Anxiety is not the right choice! Individual differences in trait anxiety modulate biases in pseudoneglect.
焦虑并非正确选择!特质焦虑的个体差异调节了假性忽视中的偏差。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2023 Aug 2;17:1201898. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1201898. eCollection 2023.
4
Goal Side Selection of Penalty Shots in Soccer: A Laboratory Study and Analyses of Men's World Cup Shoot-Outs.足球点球的球门侧选择:实验室研究与男子世界杯点球大战分析。
Percept Mot Skills. 2021 Oct;128(5):2279-2303. doi: 10.1177/00315125211025412. Epub 2021 Jun 23.
5
The reliability of pseudoneglect is task dependent.假性忽视的可靠性取决于任务。
Neuropsychologia. 2020 Nov;148:107618. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107618. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
6
Modulation of human visuospatial attention analysis by transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in the line bisection performance.经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)对人视觉空间注意力分析在直线二等分任务表现中的调节作用。
Saudi J Biol Sci. 2019 Dec;26(8):1956-1960. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2019.06.007. Epub 2019 Jun 12.
7
Evidence for a common mechanism of spatial attention and visual awareness: Towards construct validity of pseudoneglect.空间注意和视觉意识的共同机制证据:朝向假性忽视的建构效度。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 7;14(3):e0212998. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212998. eCollection 2019.
8
Temporal Cues Influence Space Estimations in Visually Impaired Individuals.时间线索影响视力受损个体的空间估计。
iScience. 2018 Aug 31;6:319-326. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2018.07.003. Epub 2018 Aug 1.
9
Prefrontal Cortex Activation and Young Driver Behaviour: A fNIRS Study.前额叶皮层激活与年轻驾驶员行为:一项功能近红外光谱研究。
PLoS One. 2016 May 26;11(5):e0156512. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156512. eCollection 2016.
10
Does gravity influence the visual line bisection task?重力会影响视觉直线二等分任务吗?
J Neurophysiol. 2016 Aug 1;116(2):629-36. doi: 10.1152/jn.00312.2016. Epub 2016 May 25.