• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Recurrent catheter-related bloodstream infections: Risk factors and outcome.

作者信息

Erbay Ayşe, Ergönül Onder, Stoddard Gregory J, Samore Matthew H

机构信息

Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.

出版信息

Int J Infect Dis. 2006 Sep;10(5):396-400. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2005.08.002. Epub 2006 May 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijid.2005.08.002
PMID:16702008
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To identify risk factors for recurrent catheter related bloodstream infections (CR-BSIs). The study was undertaken at the University of Utah Hospital and involved patients who had a CR-BSI followed by catheter removal and reinsertion between January 1998 and February 2002.

DESIGN

A retrospective chart review for the cohort study of catheters initially infected, which were then followed to study risk factors for a subsequent infection. Both central line and peripherally inserted central line catheters were included in the study. A recurrent CR-BSI was defined as positive blood cultures after three negative cultures, coupled with positive catheter tip culture or no other evident new source of infection.

RESULTS

Twenty-five (34%) of 73 patients had a recurrent CR-BSI. The first CR-BSI occurred a mean of 20.4 days after catheter insertion whereas recurrence developed a mean of 12.1 days after reinsertion (p = 0.392). Coagulase-negative staphylococci (60%) were the most common cause of recurrent infection. The recurrence was more common among the patients who were given blood product transfusion (hazard ratio (HR) 2.3; confidence interval (CI) 1.02-5.67, p = 0.049). In 20 (27%) patients, catheters were changed over a guidewire. The guidewire catheter exchange was not found to be associated with an increased risk of recurrent infection (p = 0.582).

CONCLUSION

Catheter replacement to a new site, instead of rewiring, was not shown to decrease the risk for recurrent infection. The transfusion of blood products was associated with an increased risk for recurrent infection.

摘要

相似文献

1
Recurrent catheter-related bloodstream infections: Risk factors and outcome.
Int J Infect Dis. 2006 Sep;10(5):396-400. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2005.08.002. Epub 2006 May 15.
2
[Assessment of diagnostic methods for the catheter-related bloodstream infections in intensive care units].[重症监护病房导管相关血流感染诊断方法的评估]
Mikrobiyol Bul. 2011 Jan;45(1):75-85.
3
Multilumen central venous catheters increase risk for catheter-related bloodstream infection: prospective surveillance study.多腔中心静脉导管增加导管相关血流感染风险:前瞻性监测研究。
Infection. 2008 Aug;36(4):322-7. doi: 10.1007/s15010-008-7314-x. Epub 2008 Jul 28.
4
Catheter-related bloodstream infection in adult haematology patients: catheter removal practice and outcome.成年血液学患者的导管相关血流感染:导管拔除实践与结果
J Hosp Infect. 2004 Aug;57(4):325-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2004.04.007.
5
Risk factors for recurrent catheter-related infections after catheter-related bloodstream infections.导管相关血流感染后反复发生导管相关感染的危险因素。
Int J Infect Dis. 2010 Jan;14(1):e16-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2009.01.016. Epub 2009 Apr 17.
6
Rate, risk factors and outcomes of catheter-related bloodstream infection in a paediatric intensive care unit in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯一家儿科重症监护病房中导管相关血流感染的发生率、危险因素及结局
J Hosp Infect. 2006 Feb;62(2):207-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2005.06.032. Epub 2005 Nov 22.
7
Reduced colonization and infection with miconazole-rifampicin modified central venous catheters: a randomized controlled clinical trial.咪康唑-利福平改良中心静脉导管减少定植与感染:一项随机对照临床试验
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2004 Dec;54(6):1109-15. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkh483. Epub 2004 Nov 10.
8
Central venous catheter-associated bloodstream infection and colonisation of insertion site and catheter tip. What are the rates and risk factors in haematology patients?中心静脉导管相关性血流感染及置管部位和导管尖端定植。血液病患者的发生率和危险因素有哪些?
Ann Hematol. 2010 Dec;89(12):1265-75. doi: 10.1007/s00277-010-1005-2. Epub 2010 Jun 8.
9
Prospective study of peripheral arterial catheter infection and comparison with concurrently sited central venous catheters.外周动脉导管感染的前瞻性研究及与同期放置的中心静脉导管的比较。
Crit Care Med. 2008 Feb;36(2):397-402. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318161f74b.
10
Management of the catheter in documented catheter-related coagulase-negative staphylococcal bacteremia: remove or retain?已记录的导管相关凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌菌血症中导管的管理:拔除还是保留?
Clin Infect Dis. 2009 Oct 15;49(8):1187-94. doi: 10.1086/605694.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk factors for catheter-related bloodstream infections in a high-risk cancer patient population.高危癌症患者群体中导管相关血流感染的危险因素
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2025 May 26;46(7):1-4. doi: 10.1017/ice.2025.45.
2
The epidemiology and microbiology of central venous catheter related bloodstream infections among hemodialysis patients in the Philippines: a retrospective cohort study.菲律宾血液透析患者中心静脉导管相关血流感染的流行病学和微生物学:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Nephrol. 2024 Oct 2;25(1):331. doi: 10.1186/s12882-024-03776-8.
3
Early Central Venous Catheter Replacement After Candida in Pediatric Intestinal Failure Patients.
小儿肠衰竭患者念珠菌感染后早期中心静脉导管置换
JPGN Rep. 2023 Sep 14;4(4):e358. doi: 10.1097/PG9.0000000000000358. eCollection 2023 Nov.
4
Clinical From Biofilm Formation to New Antibiofilm Strategies.临床 从生物膜形成到新的抗生物膜策略
Microorganisms. 2022 May 26;10(6):1103. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10061103.
5
Impact of transfusion on patients with sepsis admitted in intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis.输血对重症监护病房脓毒症患者的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Intensive Care. 2017 Dec;7(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s13613-016-0226-5. Epub 2017 Jan 4.
6
The microbiological and clinical outcome of guide wire exchanged versus newly inserted antimicrobial surface treated central venous catheters.导丝交换的抗菌表面处理中心静脉导管与新插入的抗菌表面处理中心静脉导管的微生物学和临床结果。
Crit Care. 2013 Sep 3;17(5):R184. doi: 10.1186/cc12867.
7
Validity of ICD-9-CM coding for identifying incident methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections: is MRSA infection coded as a chronic disease?ICD-9-CM 编码对识别耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)感染的有效性:MRSA 感染是否被编码为慢性病?
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2011 Feb;32(2):148-54. doi: 10.1086/657936.