Suppr超能文献

将已故供体的A2和A2B肾脏移植给B类等待名单上的候选者可提高他们的移植率。

Transplantation of A2 and A2B kidneys from deceased donors into B waiting list candidates increases their transplantation rate.

作者信息

Bryan Christopher F, Nelson Paul W, Shield Charles F, Ross Gilbert, Warady Bradley, Murillo Daniel, Winklhofer Franz T

机构信息

Midwest Transplant Network, Via Christi-St Francis Medical Center, Wichita, Kansas, USA.

出版信息

Clin Transpl. 2004:127-33.

Abstract

Transplant centers in the Midwest Transplant Network began transplanting kidneys from A2 or A2B donors into blood group B and O patients in 1986. Since 1991, an OPTN/UNOS variance has permitted us to allocate these kidneys preferentially into B and O waiting list patients. With more than 10 years of experience we have noted the following: 1. Thirty-one percent more blood group B patients were transplanted by allocating them A2 or A2B kidneys from our deceased donors. 2. Ten-year graft survival for B recipients of an A2 or A2B kidney (72%) was equivalent to that for B recipients of a B kidney (69%). 3. Type B recipients of simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplants (n=4) also did well with A2 or A2B organs. 4. Non-A recipients were transplanted only when their anti-A IgG titer history was consistently low (< or =4). 5. Most (90%) blood group B patients had a low anti-A IgG titer history; whereas, only one-third of blood group O patients had a low titer history. 6. Neither ethnicity nor HLA class I sensitization level influenced the anti-A IgG titer history. 7. In an OPO with mostly (87%) white donors, nearly 20% of blood group A donors were A2. 8. Waiting time until transplantation was lower for B patients who received an A2 or A2B kidney than for those who received a B or O kidney. 9. Our OPO blood group B waiting list was reduced from 25 low PRA (<40%) B candidates in 1994 to 4 in July, 2004. 10. Blood group A candidates received 6.4% fewer transplants with our A2/A2B--> B allocation algorithm. 11. Minority patients were transplanted at the same rate when using the A2/A2B--> B allocation algorithm as when using the standard UNOS algorithm for allocating B and O kidneys--> B patients.

摘要

1986年,中西部移植网络中的移植中心开始将A2或A2B供体的肾脏移植给B型和O型血的患者。自1991年以来,器官共享联合网络(OPTN)/美国器官共享与移植网络(UNOS)的一项特殊规定允许我们将这些肾脏优先分配给B型和O型血的等待名单上的患者。经过10多年的经验,我们注意到以下几点:1. 通过分配已故供体的A2或A2B肾脏,接受移植的B型血患者增加了31%。2. A2或A2B肾脏的B型受体的10年移植物存活率(72%)与B型肾脏的B型受体的存活率(69%)相当。3. 同时进行胰腺-肾脏移植的B型受体(n = 4)接受A2或A2B器官时效果也很好。4. 非A型受体只有在其抗A IgG滴度历史一直很低(≤4)时才会接受移植。5. 大多数(90%)B型血患者的抗A IgG滴度历史较低;而只有三分之一的O型血患者滴度历史较低。6. 种族和HLA I类致敏水平均不影响抗A IgG滴度历史。7. 在一个主要(87%)为白人供体的器官采购组织(OPO)中,近20%的A型血供体为A2型。8. 接受A2或A2B肾脏的B型患者的移植等待时间比接受B型或O型肾脏的患者短。9. 我们的OPO的B型血等待名单从1994年的25名低PRA(<40%)的B型候选人减少到2004年7月的4名。10. 使用我们的A2/A2B→B分配算法时,A型血候选人接受移植的比例减少了6.4%。11. 使用A2/A2B→B分配算法时,少数族裔患者的移植比例与使用标准的UNOS算法将B型和O型肾脏分配给B型患者时相同。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验