Lum Erik L, Pirzadeh Afshin, Datta Nakul, Lipshutz Gerald S, McGonigle Andrea M, Hamiduzzaman Anum, Bjelajac Natalie, Hale-Durbin Bethany, Bunnapradist Suphamai
Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA.
Kidney and Pancreas Transplant Research Center, Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA.
Kidney Med. 2024 May 21;6(7):100843. doi: 10.1016/j.xkme.2024.100843. eCollection 2024 Jul.
RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: The option for A2/A2B deceased donor kidney transplantation was integrated into the kidney allocation system in 2014 to improve access for B blood group waitlist candidates. Despite excellent reported outcomes, center uptake has remained low across the United States. Here, we examined the effect of implementing an A2/A2B protocol using a cutoff titer of ≤1:8 for IgG and ≤1:16 for IgM on blood group B kidney transplant recipients at a single center.
Retrospective observational study.
SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Blood group B recipients of deceased donor kidney transplants at a single center from January 1, 2019, to December 2022.
Recipients of deceased donor kidney transplants were analyzed based on donor blood type with comparisons of A2/A2B versus blood group compatible.
One-year patient survival, death-censored allograft function, primary nonfunction, delayed graft function, allograft function as measured using serum creatinine levels and estimated glomerular filtration rate at 1 year, biopsy-proven rejection, and need for plasmapheresis.
Comparison between the A2/A2B and compatible groups were performed using the Fisher test or the χ test for categorical variables and the nonparametric Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous variables.
A total of 104 blood type B patients received a deceased donor kidney transplant at our center during the study period, 49 (47.1%) of whom received an A2/A2B transplant. Waiting time was lower in A2/A2B recipients compared with blood group compatible recipients (57.9 months vs 74.7 months, = 0.01). A2/A2B recipients were more likely to receive a donor after cardiac death (24.5% vs 1.8%, < 0.05) and experience delayed graft function (65.3% vs 41.8%). There were no observed differences in the average serum creatinine level or estimated glomerular filtration rate at 1 month, 3 months, and 1 year post kidney transplantation, acute rejection, or primary nonfunction.
Single-center study. Small cohort size limiting outcome analysis.
Implementation of an A2/A2B protocol increased transplant volumes of blood group B waitlisted patients by 83.6% and decreased the waiting time for transplantation by 22.5% with similar transplant outcomes.
2014年,A2/A2B 已故供体肾移植选项被纳入肾脏分配系统,以改善 B 血型等待名单上候选者的获取机会。尽管报告的结果优异,但美国各中心的采用率仍然很低。在此,我们在单一中心研究了实施A2/A2B方案(IgG滴度≤1:8且IgM滴度≤1:16)对B血型肾移植受者的影响。
回顾性观察研究。
2019年1月1日至2022年12月在单一中心接受已故供体肾移植的B血型受者。
根据供体血型分析已故供体肾移植受者,并比较A2/A2B与血型相容者。
1年患者生存率、死亡审查后的移植肾功能、原发性无功能、移植功能延迟、移植1年后使用血清肌酐水平和估计肾小球滤过率测量的移植肾功能、活检证实的排斥反应以及血浆置换需求。
使用Fisher检验或χ检验对分类变量进行A2/A2B组与相容组之间的比较,对连续变量使用非参数Wilcoxon秩和检验。
在研究期间,共有104例B血型患者在我们中心接受了已故供体肾移植,其中49例(47.1%)接受了A2/A2B移植。A2/A2B受者的等待时间低于血型相容受者(57.9个月对74.7个月,P = 0.01)。A2/A2B受者更有可能接受心源性死亡后的供体(24.5%对1.8%,P < 0.05)并经历移植功能延迟(65.3%对41.8%)。在肾移植后1个月、3个月和1年时,平均血清肌酐水平或估计肾小球滤过率、急性排斥反应或原发性无功能方面未观察到差异。
单中心研究。队列规模小限制了结果分析。
实施A2/A2B方案使B血型等待名单上患者的移植量增加了83.6%,移植等待时间减少了22.5%,移植结果相似。